TSTP Solution File: LCL041-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : LCL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:47:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.22s 8.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : LCL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 18:05:53 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 8.22/8.31  %-------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.31  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 8.22/8.31  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 8.22/8.31  % Transform   :cnf
% 8.22/8.31  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 8.22/8.31  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 8.22/8.31  
% 8.22/8.31  % Result      :Theorem 7.680000s
% 8.22/8.31  % Output      :CNFRefutation 7.680000s
% 8.22/8.31  %-------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.32  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.32  % File     : LCL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 8.22/8.32  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued sentential)
% 8.22/8.32  % Problem  : CN-30 depends on the rest of Hilbert's system
% 8.22/8.32  % Version  : [McC92] axioms.
% 8.22/8.32  % English  : An early axiomatisation of Implication/Negation 2 valued
% 8.22/8.32  %            sentential calculus was {CN-3,CN-18,CN-21,CN-22,CN-30, CN-54}
% 8.22/8.32  %            by Hilbert. Show, like Lukasiewicz did, that CN-30 depends
% 8.22/8.32  %            on the rest of this axiomatisation.
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  % Refs     : [MW92]  McCune & Wos (1992), Experiments in Automated Deductio
% 8.22/8.32  %          : [McC92] McCune (1992), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 8.22/8.32  % Source   : [McC92]
% 8.22/8.32  % Names    : CN-2 [MW92]
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 8.22/8.32  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.08 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.0.1, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 8.22/8.32  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 8.22/8.32  %            Number of variables   :   14 (   2 sgn)
% 8.22/8.32  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  % Comments :
% 8.22/8.32  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
% 8.22/8.32      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 8.22/8.32      | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(cn_3,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(cn_18,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(cn_21,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(Y,implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(cn_22,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(cn_54,axiom,
% 8.22/8.32      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(not(X),Y),Y))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  cnf(prove_cn_30,negated_conjecture,
% 8.22/8.32      ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(a,b)),implies(a,b))) ).
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.32  %-------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.32  % Proof found
% 8.22/8.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 8.22/8.32  % SZS output start Proof
% 8.22/8.32  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 8.22/8.32  %VarNum:27(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 8.22/8.32  %MaxLitNum:3
% 8.22/8.32  %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 8.22/8.32  %SharedTerms:6
% 8.22/8.32  %goalClause: 6
% 8.22/8.32  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 8.22/8.32  [6]~P1(f1(f1(a2,f1(a2,a3)),f1(a2,a3)))
% 8.22/8.32  [1]P1(f1(x11,f1(x12,x11)))
% 8.22/8.32  [2]P1(f1(x21,f1(f4(x21),x22)))
% 8.22/8.32  [3]P1(f1(f1(x31,x32),f1(f1(f4(x31),x32),x32)))
% 8.22/8.32  [4]P1(f1(f1(x41,x42),f1(f1(x43,x41),f1(x43,x42))))
% 8.22/8.32  [5]P1(f1(f1(x51,f1(x52,x53)),f1(x52,f1(x51,x53))))
% 8.22/8.32  [7]P1(x71)+~P1(x72)+~P1(f1(x72,x71))
% 8.22/8.32  %EqnAxiom
% 8.22/8.32  
% 8.22/8.32  %-------------------------------------------
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(11,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(f1(x111,x112),f1(x111,f1(x113,x112))))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(20,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(f4(x201),f1(x201,x202)))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(24,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(f1(f4(f1(x241,x242)),f1(x241,f1(x243,x242))),f1(x241,f1(x243,x242))))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,11,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(46,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(f4(x461),f1(x462,f1(x461,x463))))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,11,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(65,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(x651,f1(f1(x651,x652),x652)))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,46,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(1028,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     (P1(f1(f1(f4(x10281),f1(f1(x10281,x10282),x10282)),f1(f1(x10281,x10282),x10282)))),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,65,7])).
% 8.22/8.33  cnf(1032,plain,
% 8.22/8.33     ($false),
% 8.22/8.33     inference(scs_inference,[],[1028,6,46,7]),
% 8.22/8.33     ['proof']).
% 8.22/8.33  % SZS output end Proof
% 8.22/8.33  % Total time :7.680000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------