TSTP Solution File: LCL035-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LCL035-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:51:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 12 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 11 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 2 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 32 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
falsehood: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
a: $i ).
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c0_CAMerideth,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,falsehood)),X4),X5),implies(implies(X5,X1),implies(X3,X1)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c0_CAMerideth) ).
cnf(prove_c0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_c0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
condensed_detachment ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,falsehood)),X4),X5),implies(implies(X5,X1),implies(X3,X1)))),
c0_CAMerideth ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X2,X4),implies(X3,falsehood)),X5),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)),implies(X2,X4)),implies(X5,implies(X2,X4)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(falsehood,X2)),X3),implies(X4,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,implies(falsehood,X4)),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(falsehood,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(falsehood,X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X3),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(falsehood,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,implies(X1,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(falsehood,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)),
prove_c0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL035-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 16:47:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.58 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.22/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.59 % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.59 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------