TSTP Solution File: LCL035-1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : LCL035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 07:49:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 1.04s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem  : LCL035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 10:33:34 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.62/1.04  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.62/1.04  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.62/1.04  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.62/1.04  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Clauses:
% 0.62/1.04  [
% 0.62/1.04     [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( X ) ), 
% 0.62/1.04    'is_a_theorem'( Y ) ],
% 0.62/1.04     [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), implies( Z
% 0.62/1.04    , X ) ) ) ) ],
% 0.62/1.04     [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ]
% 0.62/1.04  ] .
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.62/1.04  This is a near-Horn, non-equality  problem
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Options Used:
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  useres =            1
% 0.62/1.04  useparamod =        0
% 0.62/1.04  useeqrefl =         0
% 0.62/1.04  useeqfact =         0
% 0.62/1.04  usefactor =         1
% 0.62/1.04  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.62/1.04  usesimpdemod =      0
% 0.62/1.04  usesimpres =        4
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.62/1.04  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.62/1.04  substype =          standard
% 0.62/1.04  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.62/1.04  selectoldest =      5
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.62/1.04  litorderings [1] =  liftord
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  termordering =      none
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  litapriori =        1
% 0.62/1.04  termapriori =       0
% 0.62/1.04  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.62/1.04  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.62/1.04  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.62/1.04  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  litselect =         negative
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  maxweight =         30000
% 0.62/1.04  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.62/1.04  maxlength =         115
% 0.62/1.04  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.62/1.04  excuselevel =       0
% 0.62/1.04  increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.62/1.04  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  showgenerated =    0
% 0.62/1.04  showkept =         0
% 0.62/1.04  showselected =     0
% 0.62/1.04  showdeleted =      0
% 0.62/1.04  showresimp =       1
% 0.62/1.04  showstatus =       2000
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  prologoutput =     1
% 0.62/1.04  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.62/1.04  totalproof =       1
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  !  [4, 1]      (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  implies  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  'is_a_theorem'  [42, 1]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  falsehood  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.62/1.04  a  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Starting Search:
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.62/1.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.62/1.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 0, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y ), 
% 0.62/1.04    ~( 'is_a_theorem'( X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 1, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( X
% 0.62/1.04    , Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 2, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 3, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T
% 0.62/1.04     ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 4, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.62/1.04     )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 7, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( X, implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    falsehood, Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 8, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( Y, implies( falsehood, Z
% 0.62/1.04     ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 11, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 13, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 16, [] )
% 0.62/1.04  .
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.62/1.04  found a proof!
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  initialclauses(
% 0.62/1.04  [ clause( 18, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( 
% 0.62/1.04    X ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , clause( 19, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , clause( 20, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  ] ).
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 0, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y ), 
% 0.62/1.04    ~( 'is_a_theorem'( X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , clause( 18, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( 
% 0.62/1.04    X ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.62/1.04     ), ==>( 1, 2 ), ==>( 2, 1 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 1, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( X
% 0.62/1.04    , Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , clause( 19, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T ), :=( U
% 0.62/1.04    , U )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 2, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , clause( 20, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.04  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  
% 0.62/1.04  resolution(
% 0.62/1.04  clause( 22, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( 
% 0.62/1.04    implies( U, X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ), W ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( W ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 0, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y )
% 0.62/1.05    , ~( 'is_a_theorem'( X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 2, clause( 1, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U
% 0.62/1.05    , X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, implies( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Z, X ) ) ) ), :=( Y, W )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X ), :=( 
% 0.62/1.05    Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T ), :=( U, U )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 3, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T
% 0.62/1.05     ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 22, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ), W ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( W ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T ), :=( U
% 0.62/1.05    , U ), :=( W, W )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 1 ), ==>( 1, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 23, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.62/1.05     )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 3, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T
% 0.62/1.05     ), U ), implies( implies( U, X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 1, clause( 1, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U
% 0.62/1.05    , X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, Y ), :=( Y, T ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    U, falsehood ) ), :=( U, X ), :=( W, implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T )
% 0.62/1.05     ) ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, implies( Y, T ) ), :=( Y, implies( Z
% 0.62/1.05    , falsehood ) ), :=( Z, U ), :=( T, X ), :=( U, implies( implies( X, Y )
% 0.62/1.05    , implies( Z, Y ) ) )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 4, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.62/1.05     )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 23, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y )
% 0.62/1.05    , implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ) )
% 0.62/1.05     ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T ), :=( U
% 0.62/1.05    , U )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 25, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( W ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 0, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, Y ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( Y )
% 0.62/1.05    , ~( 'is_a_theorem'( X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 2, clause( 4, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y
% 0.62/1.05     ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) )
% 0.62/1.05     ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, implies( implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    :=( Y, W )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), 
% 0.62/1.05    :=( T, T ), :=( U, U )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 25, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), implies( U, 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ), 'is_a_theorem'( W ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T ), :=( U
% 0.62/1.05    , U ), :=( W, W )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 1 ), ==>( 1, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 26, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( X, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 1, clause( 1, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, falsehood ) ), T ), U ), implies( implies( U
% 0.62/1.05    , X ), implies( Z, X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, Z ), :=( Y, falsehood ), :=( Z, T ), :=( T, 
% 0.62/1.05    Y ), :=( U, X ), :=( W, implies( implies( implies( X, implies( falsehood
% 0.62/1.05    , Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, Z ), :=( 
% 0.62/1.05    Y, falsehood ), :=( Z, T ), :=( T, implies( falsehood, Y ) ), :=( U, 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 7, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( X, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 26, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( X, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z ), :=( T, T )] ), 
% 0.62/1.05    permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 27, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( Y, implies( falsehood, Z
% 0.62/1.05     ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 1, clause( 7, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( implies( X, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Y ) ), Z ), implies( T, Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, T ), :=( Y, falsehood ), :=( Z, U ), :=( T, 
% 0.62/1.05    Z ), :=( U, Y ), :=( W, implies( X, implies( Y, implies( falsehood, Z ) )
% 0.62/1.05     ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, implies( implies( T, falsehood ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, falsehood ) ) ), :=( Y, Z ), :=( Z, implies( Y, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Z ) ) ), :=( T, X )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 8, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( Y, implies( falsehood, Z
% 0.62/1.05     ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 27, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( Y, implies( falsehood
% 0.62/1.05    , Z ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z )] ), 
% 0.62/1.05    permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 28, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 1, clause( 8, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( Y, implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    falsehood, Z ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, Z ), :=( Y, T ), :=( Z, U ), :=( T, W ), 
% 0.62/1.05    :=( U, V0 ), :=( W, implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) )] ), 
% 0.62/1.05    substitution( 1, [ :=( X, implies( implies( implies( implies( Z, T ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, T ) ), implies( T, W ) ), implies( V0, implies( T, W ) ) ) )
% 0.62/1.05    , :=( Y, X ), :=( Z, Y )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 11, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 28, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) ) ]
% 0.62/1.05     )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.62/1.05     )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 29, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 5, [ 'is_a_theorem'( W ), ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( Z, Y ) ), implies( Y, T ) ), 
% 0.62/1.05    implies( U, implies( Y, T ) ) ), W ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 1, clause( 11, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( X, implies( falsehood, Y ) ) )
% 0.62/1.05     ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, Y ), :=( Y, Z ), :=( Z, T ), :=( T, U ), 
% 0.62/1.05    :=( U, W ), :=( W, implies( falsehood, X ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X
% 0.62/1.05    , implies( implies( implies( implies( Y, Z ), implies( T, Z ) ), implies( 
% 0.62/1.05    Z, U ) ), implies( W, implies( Z, U ) ) ) ), :=( Y, X )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 13, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 29, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  resolution(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 30, [] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 2, [ ~( 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, a ) ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, clause( 13, [ 'is_a_theorem'( implies( falsehood, X ) ) ] )
% 0.62/1.05  , 0, substitution( 0, [] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, a )] )).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsumption(
% 0.62/1.05  clause( 16, [] )
% 0.62/1.05  , clause( 30, [] )
% 0.62/1.05  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [] ) ).
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  end.
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  Memory use:
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  space for terms:        298
% 0.62/1.05  space for clauses:      1690
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  clauses generated:      19
% 0.62/1.05  clauses kept:           17
% 0.62/1.05  clauses selected:       10
% 0.62/1.05  clauses deleted:        0
% 0.62/1.05  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  subsentry:          12
% 0.62/1.05  literals s-matched: 2
% 0.62/1.05  literals matched:   2
% 0.62/1.05  full subsumption:   0
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  checksum:           -1484794820
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  
% 0.62/1.05  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------