TSTP Solution File: LCL033-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:13 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.70s 1.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  15 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  11   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   2   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (;  61   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > implies > #nlpp > falsehood > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(is_a_theorem,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(falsehood,type,
    falsehood: $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [U,Z,X,Y,V] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,falsehood)),U),V),implies(implies(V,X),implies(Z,X)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
      | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [V_7,Z_4,Y_6,U_3,X_5] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X_5,Y_6),implies(Z_4,falsehood)),U_3),V_7),implies(implies(V_7,X_5),implies(Z_4,X_5)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [U_13,X_14,Y_12,V_10,Z_11] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X_14,Y_12),implies(Z_11,falsehood)),U_13),V_10),implies(implies(V_10,X_14),implies(Z_11,X_14)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    ! [Y_16,V_18,U_15,Z_19,X_17] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(V_18,X_17),implies(Z_19,X_17)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X_17,Y_16),implies(Z_19,falsehood)),U_15),V_18)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_2]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [Z_21,Z_24,Y_22,V_20,X_23] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(V_20,X_23),implies(Z_21,X_23)),implies(X_23,Y_22)),implies(Z_24,implies(X_23,Y_22)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_13]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [U_13,X_14,Y_12,V_10,Z_11] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(V_10,X_14),implies(Z_11,X_14)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X_14,Y_12),implies(Z_11,falsehood)),U_13),V_10)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_2]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [Z_25,Y_26,V_27,Z_28] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(Z_25,implies(falsehood,Y_26)),V_27),implies(Z_28,V_27))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_12]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [Z_29,V_30,X_31] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(Z_29,V_30),X_31),implies(falsehood,X_31))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_12]) ).

tff(c_43,plain,
    ! [X_31,X_14,Z_11] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(falsehood,X_31),X_14),implies(Z_11,X_14))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_12]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    ! [Z_43,V_47,X_46,Y_45,Z_44] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(Z_44,implies(X_46,Y_45)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(V_47,X_46),implies(Z_43,X_46)),implies(X_46,Y_45))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_2]) ).

tff(c_126,plain,
    ! [Z_50,Z_51,Z_52] : is_a_theorem(implies(Z_50,implies(Z_51,implies(Z_52,Z_51)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_80]) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    ! [Z_51,Z_52,Z_50] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(Z_51,implies(Z_52,Z_51)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(Z_50) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_2]) ).

tff(c_151,plain,
    ! [Z_50] : ~ is_a_theorem(Z_50),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).

tff(c_93,plain,
    ! [Z_44,Z_11,Z_43] : is_a_theorem(implies(Z_44,implies(Z_11,implies(Z_43,Z_11)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_80]) ).

tff(c_164,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_93]) ).

tff(c_165,plain,
    ! [Z_51,Z_52] : is_a_theorem(implies(Z_51,implies(Z_52,Z_51))),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,implies(b,a))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_168,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_165,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LCL033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:02:09 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.70/1.77  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.78  
% 2.85/1.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.85/1.81  
% 2.85/1.81  Inference rules
% 2.85/1.81  ----------------------
% 2.85/1.81  #Ref     : 0
% 2.85/1.81  #Sup     : 29
% 2.85/1.81  #Fact    : 0
% 2.85/1.81  #Define  : 0
% 2.85/1.81  #Split   : 2
% 2.85/1.81  #Chain   : 0
% 2.85/1.81  #Close   : 0
% 2.85/1.81  
% 2.85/1.81  Ordering : KBO
% 2.85/1.81  
% 2.85/1.81  Simplification rules
% 2.85/1.81  ----------------------
% 2.85/1.81  #Subsume      : 7
% 2.85/1.81  #Demod        : 13
% 2.85/1.81  #Tautology    : 12
% 2.85/1.81  #SimpNegUnit  : 12
% 2.85/1.81  #BackRed      : 8
% 2.85/1.81  
% 2.85/1.81  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.85/1.81  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.85/1.81  
% 2.85/1.81  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.85/1.81  ----------------------
% 2.85/1.82  Preprocessing        : 0.39
% 2.85/1.82  Parsing              : 0.22
% 2.85/1.82  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.85/1.82  Main loop            : 0.26
% 2.85/1.82  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 2.85/1.82  Reduction            : 0.07
% 2.85/1.82  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 2.85/1.82  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.85/1.82  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.85/1.82  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.85/1.82  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.85/1.82  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.85/1.82  Total                : 0.71
% 2.85/1.82  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.85/1.82  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.85/1.82  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.85/1.82  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------