TSTP Solution File: LCL032-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL032-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 89.81s 90.02s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL032-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:10:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 89.81/90.02  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 89.81/90.02  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 89.81/90.02  Wed Jul 27 09:10:36 2022
% 89.81/90.02  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 11448.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 89.81/90.02  set(auto).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: set(auto1).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: set(process_input).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 89.81/90.02  clear(print_given).
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  list(usable).
% 89.81/90.02  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 89.81/90.02  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(Z,falsehood)),U),V),implies(implies(V,X),implies(Z,X)))).
% 89.81/90.02  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,b),implies(implies(b,c),implies(a,c)))).
% 89.81/90.02  end_of_list.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 89.81/90.02  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 89.81/90.02  in usable.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 89.81/90.02     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  ------------> process usable:
% 89.81/90.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 89.81/90.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,b),implies(implies(b,c),implies(a,c)))).
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  ------------> process sos:
% 89.81/90.02  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 3 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,falsehood)),D),E),implies(implies(E,A),implies(C,A)))).
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  ======= end of input processing =======
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  =========== start of search ===========
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  Resetting weight limit to 16.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  Resetting weight limit to 16.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  sos_size=5387
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  ============ end of search ============
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  -------------- statistics -------------
% 89.81/90.02  clauses given               8190
% 89.81/90.02  clauses generated        39651938
% 89.81/90.02  clauses kept                8305
% 89.81/90.02  clauses forward subsumed 13385968
% 89.81/90.02  clauses back subsumed        135
% 89.81/90.02  Kbytes malloced             6835
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 89.81/90.02  user CPU time         88.10          (0 hr, 1 min, 28 sec)
% 89.81/90.02  system CPU time        0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 89.81/90.02  wall-clock time       89             (0 hr, 1 min, 29 sec)
% 89.81/90.02  
% 89.81/90.02  Process 11448 finished Wed Jul 27 09:12:05 2022
% 89.81/90.02  Otter interrupted
% 89.81/90.02  PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------