TSTP Solution File: LCL027-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:48:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).

cnf(c0_2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).

cnf(c0_5,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X)) ).

cnf(c0_6,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).

cnf(prove_c0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,implies(implies(X_373,falsehood),falsehood))),
    inference(subst,[],[c0_2:[bind(X,$fot(falsehood)),bind(Y,$fot(implies(X_373,falsehood)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(X_42,X_43)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X_42,X_43)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)))),bind(Y,$fot(implies(X_42,X_43)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X_6,implies(Y,X_6))),
    inference(subst,[],[c0_2:[bind(X,$fot(X_6))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X_6)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_6,implies(Y,X_6)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(Y,X_6)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(X_6)),bind(Y,$fot(implies(Y,X_6)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X_6)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(Y,X_6)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(X_6,implies(Y,X_6))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X_9,implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(Y,$fot(X_9)),bind(X_6,$fot(implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X_9,implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X,falsehood),falsehood),X)) )],[c0_5,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X_33,implies(implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood),X_35))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X,$fot(X_35)),bind(X_9,$fot(X_33))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)))),bind(Y,$fot(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) )],[c0_6,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_33,implies(implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood),X_35)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_33,implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(X_33,X_35))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X,$fot(X_33)),bind(Y,$fot(implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood))),bind(Z,$fot(X_35))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_33,implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(X_33,X_35))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(X_33,implies(implies(implies(X_35,falsehood),falsehood),X_35))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(X_42,X_43))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_33,$fot(X_42)),bind(X_35,$fot(X_43))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X_42,X_43)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_42,implies(implies(X_43,falsehood),falsehood)),implies(X_42,X_43))) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,implies(implies(X_373,falsehood),falsehood)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X_373)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(X_42,$fot(falsehood)),bind(X_43,$fot(X_373))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,X_373)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,implies(implies(X_373,falsehood),falsehood))) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(X_373,$fot(a))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(implies(falsehood,a)) )],[refute_0_16,prove_c0_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 21:10:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------