TSTP Solution File: LCL024-10 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL024-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:19:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 175.57s 22.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 175.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL024-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 15:50:01 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.37 #
% 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 4 Number of unprocessed: 4
% 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.37 # 4 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.37 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.37 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.37 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.14/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.14/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.14/0.37 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.37 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 175.57/22.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 175.57/22.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 175.57/22.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 175.57/22.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 175.57/22.38
% 175.57/22.38 # End clausification derivation
% 175.57/22.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)),equivalent(X3,X2))))=true)).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=true)).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 175.57/22.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 175.57/22.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 175.57/22.38 # Found 5 steps
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))),X6)=equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))),X6)=equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (is_a_theorem(ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))),X6))=is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 175.57/22.38 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (is_a_theorem(ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(true,X1)),equivalent(true,X2))),X6))=true), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_43, ...])).
% 175.57/22.38 # End printing tableau
% 175.57/22.38 # SZS output end
% 175.57/22.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 175.57/22.41 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 175.57/22.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 175.57/22.41 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 175.57/22.41 # Begin clausification derivation
% 175.57/22.41
% 175.57/22.41 # End clausification derivation
% 175.57/22.41 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X3,X1)),equivalent(X3,X2))))=true)).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=true)).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 175.57/22.41 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 175.57/22.41 # Begin printing tableau
% 175.57/22.41 # Found 6 steps
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ifeq(X15,X15,true,X13)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq(X15,X15,true,X13)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=ifeq(X15,X15,true,X13)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (true!=ifeq(X15,X15,true,X13)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 175.57/22.41 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),c),equivalent(b,a)))!=true), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_44, ...])).
% 175.57/22.41 # End printing tableau
% 175.57/22.41 # SZS output end
% 175.57/22.41 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 175.57/22.46 # Child (23415) has found a proof.
% 175.57/22.46
% 175.57/22.46 # Proof search is over...
% 175.57/22.46 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------