TSTP Solution File: LCL023-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:42:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.97s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 71 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),equivalent(X0,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yql) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_2) ).
cnf(c_117,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X1),equivalent(X0,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_128,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_162,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X1))))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X2),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_128]) ).
cnf(c_163,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X3))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_128]) ).
cnf(c_222,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_162]) ).
cnf(c_223,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X0),X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_162]) ).
cnf(c_268,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_128]) ).
cnf(c_283,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X2,X0)),equivalent(X2,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_268]) ).
cnf(c_285,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X2),equivalent(X2,X1))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_268]) ).
cnf(c_323,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X0),X2),equivalent(X3,X1))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_163]) ).
cnf(c_407,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X2,X0)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_466,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_407]) ).
cnf(c_480,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X3,X0),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_484,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X0)),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_407]) ).
cnf(c_696,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X1,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_480]) ).
cnf(c_755,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_885,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X0,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_484]) ).
cnf(c_888,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,equivalent(X0,X1)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_484]) ).
cnf(c_1090,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(b,c)),c)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_1191,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_888,c_696]) ).
cnf(c_1263,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,equivalent(X1,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_888,c_885]) ).
cnf(c_1612,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X0,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1191,c_885]) ).
cnf(c_1671,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1612,c_696]) ).
cnf(c_1675,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1671,c_755]) ).
cnf(c_3318,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X0,X1)),X1)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1263,c_1675]) ).
cnf(c_3337,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1090,c_3318]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:42:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.97/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 2.97/1.17 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 2.97/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.97/1.17 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 clauses 3
% 2.97/1.17 conjectures 1
% 2.97/1.17 EPR 0
% 2.97/1.17 Horn 3
% 2.97/1.17 unary 2
% 2.97/1.17 binary 0
% 2.97/1.17 lits 5
% 2.97/1.17 lits eq 0
% 2.97/1.17 fd_pure 0
% 2.97/1.17 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.97/1.17 fd_cond 0
% 2.97/1.17 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.97/1.17 AC symbols 0
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------
% 2.97/1.17 Current options:
% 2.97/1.17 ------
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 ------ Proving...
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.17
% 2.97/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.97/1.18
% 2.97/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------