TSTP Solution File: LCL023-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:19:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.71s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X)
| is_a_theorem(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(yql,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),equivalent(X,Z)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yql) ).
cnf(prove_ec_2,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_2) ).
cnf(4,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),equivalent(U,Y))),equivalent(equivalent(U,Z),X))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,yql,yql]) ).
cnf(6,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(X,Y))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,yql]) ).
cnf(7,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(X,Z),equivalent(equivalent(U,Y),equivalent(Z,U))))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,4]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(Y,Z),X))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,6,yql]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(a,equivalent(b,c)))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,11,prove_ec_2]) ).
cnf(226,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),Z),equivalent(equivalent(Z,X),Y))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,7,4]) ).
cnf(260,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),Z),equivalent(Y,Z)),X)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,226,226]) ).
cnf(262,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),Z))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,226,4]) ).
cnf(318,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z))),equivalent(Y,Z))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,262,4]) ).
cnf(539,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),Z),equivalent(X,equivalent(Z,Y)))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,318,226]) ).
cnf(607,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,539,260,16]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 18:57:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T18:57:29
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T18:57:29
% 0.49/0.71
% 0.49/0.71
% 0.49/0.71 #||
% 0.49/0.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/0.71 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.71 ||#
% 0.49/0.71
% 0.49/0.71 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.49/0.71 ; 1808 formulas have been input or derived (from 42 formulas).
% 0.49/0.71 ; 607 (34%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.49/0.71 ; 8 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.49/0.71 ; 599 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.49/0.71 ;
% 0.49/0.71 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.001 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Assert (3 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.054 23% Process new row (1,544 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.083 35% Resolution (82 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.007 3% Paramodulation (41 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (1 call)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (1 call)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (1 call)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.035 15% Forward simplification (1,533 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.020 9% Backward simplification (607 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.034 15% Other
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.234 Total
% 0.49/0.71 ; 0.236 Real time
% 0.49/0.71 ;
% 0.49/0.71 ; Term-hash-array has 1,744 terms in all.
% 0.49/0.71 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.49/0.71 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.49/0.71 ; Path-index has 1,728 entries (1,728 at peak, 1,752 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Path-index has 1,079 nodes (1,079 at peak, 1,079 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Trie-index has 1,728 entries (1,728 at peak, 1,752 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Trie-index has 5,377 nodes (5,377 at peak, 5,507 added, 130 deleted).
% 0.49/0.71 ; Retrieved 16,070 generalization terms in 1,531 calls.
% 0.49/0.71 ; Retrieved 4,825 instance terms in 605 calls.
% 0.49/0.71 ; Retrieved 82,945 unifiable terms in 1,351 calls.
% 0.49/0.71 ;
% 0.49/0.71 ; The agenda of rows to process has 106 entries:
% 0.49/0.71 ; 1 with value 13 30 with value 24 1 with value 30
% 0.49/0.71 ; 1 with value 18 4 with value 25 1 with value 31
% 0.49/0.71 ; 6 with value 19 1 with value 26 6 with value 32
% 0.49/0.71 ; 6 with value 21 1 with value 27 1 with value 33
% 0.49/0.71 ; 4 with value 22 14 with value 28 2 with value 36
% 0.49/0.71 ; 20 with value 23 4 with value 29 3 with value 37
% 0.49/0.71 ; The agenda of rows to give has 560 entries:
% 0.49/0.71 ; 20 with value (4 23) 42 with value (4 29) 26 with value (4 35)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 17 with value (4 24) 18 with value (4 30) 63 with value (4 36)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 8 with value (4 25) 30 with value (4 31) 31 with value (4 37)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 25 with value (4 26) 60 with value (4 32) 4 with value (4 39)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 44 with value (4 27) 44 with value (4 33) 4 with value (4 40)
% 0.49/0.71 ; 96 with value (4 28) 28 with value (4 34)
% 0.49/0.71 Evaluation took:
% 0.49/0.71 0.236 seconds of real time
% 0.49/0.71 0.218331 seconds of user run time
% 0.49/0.71 0.018124 seconds of system run time
% 0.49/0.71 [Run times include 0.012 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.49/0.71 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.49/0.71 0 page faults and
% 0.49/0.71 14,039,712 bytes consed.
% 0.49/0.71 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.71 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T18:57:30
% 0.55/0.71 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.71 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------