TSTP Solution File: LCL023-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.67s 1.93s
% Output   : Refutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL023-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(b,c)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c))),
    file('LCL023-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,B),e_quivalent(A,C)))),
    file('LCL023-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),e_quivalent(D,B))),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(D,C),A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,3,1,3')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(A,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,C),A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1,3')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,C),e_quivalent(C,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1,4')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(C,A)),e_quivalent(C,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1,3')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,A),e_quivalent(B,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,1,4')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[27,1,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,27,1,27')] ).

cnf(37,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(B,A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[33,1,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,33,1,10')] ).

cnf(57,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),A),B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,1,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,1,10')] ).

cnf(59,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(e_quivalent(B,A),B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[57,1,37]),
    [iquote('hyper,57,1,37')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(A,B)),B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[59,1,13]),
    [iquote('hyper,59,1,13')] ).

cnf(88,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,e_quivalent(C,B)),A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[66,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,66,1,3')] ).

cnf(1138,plain,
    is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,e_quivalent(B,C)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[88,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,88,1,4')] ).

cnf(1139,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[1138,2]),
    [iquote('binary,1138.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : LCL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:17:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.67/1.93  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.67/1.93  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 1.67/1.93  Wed Jul 27 09:17:10 2022
% 1.67/1.93  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 23019.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.67/1.93  set(auto).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.67/1.93  clear(print_given).
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  list(usable).
% 1.67/1.93  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 1.67/1.93  0 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(X,Y),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(Z,Y),e_quivalent(X,Z)))).
% 1.67/1.93  0 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(b,c)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c))).
% 1.67/1.93  end_of_list.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.67/1.93  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.67/1.93  in usable.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.67/1.93     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ------------> process usable:
% 1.67/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 1.67/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,e_quivalent(b,c)),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(a,b),c))).
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ------------> process sos:
% 1.67/1.93  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 3 [] is_a_theorem(e_quivalent(e_quivalent(A,B),e_quivalent(e_quivalent(C,B),e_quivalent(A,C)))).
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.04 sec ----> 1139 [binary,1138.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  Length of proof is 13.  Level of proof is 11.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.67/1.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.67/1.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.67/1.93  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ============ end of search ============
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.67/1.93  clauses given                 52
% 1.67/1.93  clauses generated           2041
% 1.67/1.93  clauses kept                1138
% 1.67/1.93  clauses forward subsumed     906
% 1.67/1.93  clauses back subsumed         10
% 1.67/1.93  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.67/1.93  user CPU time          0.04          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.67/1.93  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.67/1.93  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.67/1.93  
% 1.67/1.93  Process 23019 finished Wed Jul 27 09:17:11 2022
% 1.67/1.93  Otter interrupted
% 1.67/1.93  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------