TSTP Solution File: LCL013-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nMONt8S4ZN true
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:57:50 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nMONt8S4ZN true
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 02:13:37 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.72 % BCE start: 3
% 0.20/0.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.72 % PE start: 3
% 0.20/0.72 logic: neq
% 0.20/0.72 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.72 % done 5 iterations in 0.008s
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.72 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(xgf, axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @
% 0.20/0.72 X @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @ Y @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @ ( equivalent @ Z @ Y ) ) ))).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xgf])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xgf])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.20/0.72 ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.20/0.72 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.20/0.72 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 0.20/0.72 | (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.20/0.72 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.20/0.72 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @ X2)
% 0.20/0.72 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))
% 0.20/0.72 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1)))
% 0.20/0.72 | (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(prove_um, conjecture,
% 0.20/0.72 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @ b @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) ) ))).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.72 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @
% 0.20/0.72 ( equivalent @ b @ ( equivalent @ c @ a ) ) ) )),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_um])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ b @ (equivalent @ c @ a))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ c @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ (equivalent @ c @ a)) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ a @ b))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.20/0.72 (is_a_theorem @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 0.20/0.72 (equivalent @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xgf])).
% 0.20/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, ($false),
% 0.20/0.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 % Terminating...
% 0.20/0.75 % Runner terminated.
% 0.20/0.76 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------