TSTP Solution File: LCL013-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:12:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_um)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xgf)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a))))))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a))))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b))),equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c))),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xgf)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(c,equivalent(equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(a,b)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xgf)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 21:09:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % symbols: 7
% 0.12/0.34 % clauses: 3
% 0.12/0.34 % start clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 53
% 0.12/0.34 % maximum path limit: 4
% 0.12/0.34 % literal attempts: 262
% 0.12/0.34 % depth failures: 69
% 0.12/0.34 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % tautology failures: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % reductions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % extensions: 211
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT variables: 211
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT clauses: 213
% 0.12/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 205
% 0.12/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------