TSTP Solution File: LCL013-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:48:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).

cnf(xgf,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))) ).

cnf(prove_um,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(equivalent(X_23,equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(X_20,X_24))),equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23)))),
    inference(subst,[],[xgf:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)))),bind(Y,$fot(X_23)),bind(Z,$fot(equivalent(X_20,X_24)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)),equivalent(X_12,X_11)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_12,X_11)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)))),bind(Y,$fot(equivalent(X_12,X_11)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))),
    inference(subst,[],[xgf:[bind(X,$fot(X_3))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X_3)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[condensed_detachment:[bind(X,$fot(X_3)),bind(Y,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X_3)
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_3,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X_3,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_5,equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))),X_6)),equivalent(X_6,X_5))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(Y,$fot(X_5)),bind(Z,$fot(X_6)),bind(X_3,$fot(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_5,equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y))),X_6)),equivalent(X_6,X_5))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))) )],[xgf,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)),equivalent(X_12,X_11))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(X,$fot(X_8)),bind(Y,$fot(X_9)),bind(Z,$fot(X_10)),bind(X_5,$fot(X_11)),bind(X_6,$fot(X_12))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(X_12,X_11)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_11,equivalent(equivalent(X_8,equivalent(equivalent(X_9,equivalent(X_8,X_10)),equivalent(X_10,X_9))),X_12)),equivalent(X_12,X_11))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(equivalent(X_23,equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(X_20,X_24))),equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23))))
    | is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23),equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_8:[bind(X_10,$fot(X_20)),bind(X_11,$fot(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)))),bind(X_12,$fot(equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23))),bind(X_8,$fot(X_23)),bind(X_9,$fot(X_24))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23),equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(equivalent(X_23,equivalent(equivalent(X_24,equivalent(X_23,X_20)),equivalent(X_20,X_24))),equivalent(equivalent(X_20,X_24),X_23)))) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_10:[bind(X_20,$fot(a)),bind(X_23,$fot(c)),bind(X_24,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))) )],[refute_0_11,prove_um]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : LCL013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 21:20:30 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------