%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : LCL013-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art08.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/LCL/LCL013-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: hne
% detected subclass: small
% detected subclass: short
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 29 #f 5 5)
% (binary-unit 11 #f 5 5)
% (binary-double 17 #f 5 5)
% (hyper 29 #f)
% (binary-unit 34 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 40 #f)
% (binary 17 #t)
% (binary-order 29 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 111 #f 5 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 283 #f)
% 
% 
% **** EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED ****
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(3,40,1,6,0,1,9,50,1,12,0,1,17,50,1,20,0,1,25,50,1,28,0,1)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 26 [] -is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y)) | -is_a_theorem(X) | is_a_theorem(Y).
% 27 [] is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Z)),equivalent(Z,Y)))).
% 28 [] -is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),equivalent(b,equivalent(c,a)))).
% 31 [hyper:26,27,27] is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(equivalent(Y,equivalent(equivalent(Z,equivalent(Y,U)),equivalent(U,Z))),V)),equivalent(V,X))).
% 37 [hyper:26,31,27,slowcut:28] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 8
% seconds given: 29
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    13
%  derived clauses:   36
%  kept clauses:      1
%  kept size sum:     20
%  kept mid-nuclei:   15
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    3
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  0
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/LCL/LCL013-1+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------