TSTP Solution File: LCL011-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:19:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(yqj,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,X),equivalent(Y,Z)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yqj) ).

cnf(prove_yqf,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(c,b)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_yqf) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(U,Y),equivalent(Z,U)),X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,yqj,yqj]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(U,Y),X)),equivalent(Z,U))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,4,yqj]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,equivalent(X,Y)))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,6,4]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),X)),Z)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,10,4]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(X,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,15,4]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(Y,X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,22,yqj]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X,equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(equivalent(Z,Y),X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,28,yqj]) ).

cnf(267,plain,
    is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X,Y),equivalent(Y,Z)),equivalent(Z,X))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,33,yqj]) ).

cnf(270,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment,33,prove_yqf]),267]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 22:07:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T22:07:52
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n006.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T22:07:52
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  #||
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.58  ||#
% 0.38/0.58  
% 0.38/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.38/0.58  ;       866 formulas have been input or derived (from 26 formulas).
% 0.38/0.58  ;       270 (31%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.38/0.58  ;          270 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.38/0.58  ; 
% 0.38/0.58  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.029  26%   Process new row              (730 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.025  22%   Resolution                   (50 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.003   3%   Paramodulation               (25 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.010   9%   Forward simplification       (730 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.015  13%   Backward simplification      (270 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.029  26%   Other
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.112        Total
% 0.38/0.58  ;     0.114        Real time
% 0.38/0.58  ; 
% 0.38/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 828 terms in all.
% 0.38/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 nodes (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.38/0.58  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.38/0.58  ; Path-index has 831 entries (831 at peak, 831 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ; Path-index has 702 nodes (702 at peak, 702 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ; Trie-index has 831 entries (831 at peak, 831 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ; Trie-index has 2,098 nodes (2,098 at peak, 2,098 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.38/0.58  ; Retrieved 3,072 generalization terms in 728 calls.
% 0.38/0.58  ; Retrieved 2,648 instance terms in 268 calls.
% 0.38/0.58  ; Retrieved 17,068 unifiable terms in 725 calls.
% 0.38/0.58  ; 
% 0.38/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to process has 46 entries:
% 0.38/0.58  ;     7 with value 24             10 with value 29               4 with value 32
% 0.38/0.58  ;     8 with value 25              6 with value 30               1 with value 33
% 0.38/0.58  ;     4 with value 26              4 with value 31               1 with value 37
% 0.38/0.58  ;     1 with value 28
% 0.38/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 244 entries:
% 0.38/0.58  ;     5 with value (4 23)         51 with value (4 28)          13 with value (4 33)
% 0.38/0.58  ;    19 with value (4 24)         19 with value (4 29)           5 with value (4 34)
% 0.38/0.58  ;    15 with value (4 25)         11 with value (4 30)           7 with value (4 35)
% 0.38/0.58  ;    16 with value (4 26)         13 with value (4 31)           8 with value (4 36)
% 0.38/0.58  ;    41 with value (4 27)         16 with value (4 32)           5 with value (4 37)
% 0.38/0.58  Evaluation took:
% 0.38/0.58    0.114 seconds of real time
% 0.38/0.58    0.101141 seconds of user run time
% 0.38/0.58    0.012937 seconds of system run time
% 0.38/0.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.38/0.58    0 page faults and
% 0.38/0.58    6,477,920 bytes consed.
% 0.38/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T22:07:52
% 0.38/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------