TSTP Solution File: LCL011-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:23:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.h1Iuepribl/E---3.1_9483.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(yqj,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X2,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.h1Iuepribl/E---3.1_9483.p',yqj) ).
cnf(prove_yqf,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(c,b)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.h1Iuepribl/E---3.1_9483.p',prove_yqf) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
condensed_detachment ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X2,X3)))),
yqj ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),equivalent(X3,X4)),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X3,X4)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X4)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X4),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X1,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X1),equivalent(X2,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(c,b)))),
prove_yqf ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:36:53 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.h1Iuepribl/E---3.1_9483.p
% 0.23/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # sh5l with pid 9563 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.23/0.53 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 9567 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.23/0.53 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.23/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.23/0.53 # Processed clauses : 23
% 0.23/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.23/0.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.23/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/0.53 # Generated clauses : 78
% 0.23/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 58
% 0.23/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Paramodulations : 78
% 0.23/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.23/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 0.23/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 62
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.23/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.23/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.23/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 134
% 0.23/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.23/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1063
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.53 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.53 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.23/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------