TSTP Solution File: LCL011-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:51:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 10 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 14 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 2 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
equivalent: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
b: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
c: $i ).
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(yqj,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X2,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',yqj) ).
cnf(prove_yqf,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(c,b)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_yqf) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
condensed_detachment ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),equivalent(X2,X3)))),
yqj ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X3,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),equivalent(X3,X4)),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X3,X4)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X4,X2),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X3,X4)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X2,X4),equivalent(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X2),equivalent(equivalent(X3,X1),X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X2,X3)),equivalent(X1,X3))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X1),equivalent(X2,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(equivalent(a,c),equivalent(c,b)))),
prove_yqf ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(equivalent(X1,X3),equivalent(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LCL011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 02:21:24 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.57 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.18/0.57 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------