TSTP Solution File: LAT396-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LAT396-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:52:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Satisfiable 11.01s 1.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : LAT396-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 21:20:37 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.11/0.36 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.11/0.36 #
% 0.11/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.36 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.11/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.11/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.11/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.11/0.36 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.11/0.36 # No conjectures after preprocessing. Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive.
% 0.11/0.36 # No conjectures.
% 0.11/0.36 # There are 11 start rule candidates:
% 0.11/0.36 # Found 10 unit axioms.
% 0.11/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.11/0.36 # 11 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.11/0.36 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.11/0.36 # 10 unit axiom clauses
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 9.76/1.63 # Creating equality axioms
% 9.76/1.63 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 9.76/1.64 # Creating equality axioms
% 9.76/1.64 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 9.76/1.65 # Creating equality axioms
% 9.76/1.65 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 10.42/1.68 # Creating equality axioms
% 10.42/1.68 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 11.01/1.76 # 14567 Satisfiable branch
% 11.01/1.76 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 11.01/1.76 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.01/1.76 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.01/1.76 # Begin clausification derivation
% 11.01/1.76
% 11.01/1.76 # End clausification derivation
% 11.01/1.76 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (meet(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (join(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (meet(X1,complement(X1))=zero)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (join(X1,complement(X1))=one)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (complement(X1)=X2|meet(X1,X2)!=zero|join(X1,X2)!=one)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 11.01/1.76 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 11.01/1.76 # Begin printing tableau
% 11.01/1.76 # Found 6 steps
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (zero=zero), inference(start_rule)).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (zero=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_43])).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (meet(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (meet(zero,meet(zero,zero))=meet(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (meet(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 11.01/1.76 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (meet(zero,meet(zero,zero))=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 11.01/1.76 # End printing tableau
% 11.01/1.76 # SZS output end
% 11.01/1.76 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 11.01/1.76 # 14565 Satisfiable branch
% 11.01/1.76 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 11.01/1.76 # Child (14567) has found a proof.
% 11.01/1.76
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 11.01/1.76 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 11.01/1.76 # Proof search is over...
% 11.01/1.76 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------