TSTP Solution File: LAT394-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LAT394-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.91s 2.12s
% Output   : Refutation 1.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  34 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (  33 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (  21 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    f(x0,f(x0,x0)) != f(x1,f(x1,x1)),
    file('LAT394-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,plain,
    f(x1,f(x1,x1)) != f(x0,f(x0,x0)),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[1])]),
    [iquote('copy,1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),D),f(B,f(f(B,f(f(A,A),A)),C))) = B,
    file('LAT394-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    f(f(f(f(A,f(f(f(B,C),f(C,D)),E)),C),F),f(f(f(f(B,C),f(C,D)),E),f(f(f(f(f(B,C),f(C,D)),E),f(f(A,A),A)),f(C,f(f(C,f(f(B,B),B)),D))))) = f(f(f(B,C),f(C,D)),E),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,5]),
    [iquote('para_into,4.1.1.1.1.2,4.1.1')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    f(A,f(f(A,B),f(f(f(A,B),f(f(f(C,A),f(C,A)),f(C,A))),D))) = f(A,B),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,5]),
    [iquote('para_into,4.1.1.1,4.1.1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    f(f(A,B),f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),B)) = f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,5]),
    [iquote('para_into,12.1.1.2.2,4.1.1')] ).

cnf(26,plain,
    f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,f(f(f(B,f(f(A,A),A)),f(f(f(C,B),f(C,B)),f(C,B))),D))),E),f(B,f(f(A,A),A))) = B,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,5]),
    [iquote('para_from,12.1.1,4.1.1.2')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),B),f(B,B)) = B,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,5]),5]),
    [iquote('para_into,22.1.1.2.1,4.1.1,demod,5')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    f(f(A,A),f(A,A)) = A,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,43]),
    [iquote('para_into,42.1.1.1.1,42.1.1')] ).

cnf(78,plain,
    f(A,f(f(A,f(f(A,A),B)),f(A,A))) = f(A,f(f(A,A),B)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,22]),43,43]),
    [iquote('para_from,42.1.1,22.1.1.1,demod,43,43')] ).

cnf(167,plain,
    f(f(A,B),f(A,f(f(A,f(f(A,A),A)),A))) = A,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[66,5]),
    [iquote('para_from,66.1.1,4.1.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(180,plain,
    f(A,f(f(A,B),f(A,B))) = f(A,B),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[167,13]),
    [iquote('para_from,166.1.1,12.1.1.2.2')] ).

cnf(185,plain,
    f(A,f(f(A,f(f(A,A),A)),A)) = f(A,A),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[167,66]),167])]),
    [iquote('para_from,166.1.1,66.1.1.2,demod,167,flip.1')] ).

cnf(195,plain,
    f(f(A,B),f(A,A)) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[167]),185]),
    [iquote('back_demod,166,demod,185')] ).

cnf(197,plain,
    f(A,f(f(A,A),B)) = f(A,A),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[78]),195])]),
    [iquote('back_demod,78,demod,195,flip.1')] ).

cnf(201,plain,
    f(f(f(A,A),B),A) = f(A,A),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[195,195]),
    [iquote('para_into,194.1.1.2,194.1.1')] ).

cnf(207,plain,
    f(f(A,A),f(A,B)) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[197,195]),195]),
    [iquote('para_into,196.1.1.2.1,194.1.1,demod,195')] ).

cnf(218,plain,
    f(f(f(A,B),f(A,B)),A) = f(A,B),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[207,195]),
    [iquote('para_into,206.1.1.2,194.1.1')] ).

cnf(244,plain,
    f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),D),f(B,B)) = B,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[180,5]),5,5]),
    [iquote('para_into,180.1.1.2.1,4.1.1,demod,5,5')] ).

cnf(271,plain,
    f(f(A,B),f(B,B)) = B,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[244,195]),
    [iquote('para_into,244.1.1.1,194.1.1')] ).

cnf(287,plain,
    f(A,f(f(B,A),f(B,A))) = f(B,A),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[271,195]),
    [iquote('para_from,270.1.1,194.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(289,plain,
    f(f(A,A),f(B,A)) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[271,218]),271,271]),
    [iquote('para_from,270.1.1,218.1.1.1.2,demod,271,271')] ).

cnf(290,plain,
    f(A,f(B,f(A,A))) = f(A,A),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[289,289]),
    [iquote('para_into,288.1.1.1,288.1.1')] ).

cnf(361,plain,
    f(f(A,B),f(A,f(f(C,C),C))) = A,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[26,290]),271]),
    [iquote('para_into,26.1.1.1.1.2,290.1.1,demod,271')] ).

cnf(365,plain,
    f(f(f(f(A,A),A),f(f(A,A),A)),B) = f(f(A,A),A),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[26,8]),287,197,197,207,287,197,13,289,201,195,287,197])]),
    [iquote('para_from,26.1.1,8.1.1.2.2.1,demod,287,197,197,207,287,197,13,289,201,195,287,197,flip.1')] ).

cnf(366,plain,
    f(A,A) = f(A,f(f(B,B),B)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[26,289]),361]),
    [iquote('para_from,26.1.1,288.1.1.2,demod,361')] ).

cnf(371,plain,
    f(f(A,A),f(f(B,B),B)) = A,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[366,289])]),
    [iquote('para_into,366.1.1,288.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(385,plain,
    f(f(A,f(f(B,B),B)),f(C,A)) = A,
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[366,289]),
    [iquote('para_from,366.1.1,288.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(407,plain,
    f(f(A,A),f(B,f(B,B))) = A,
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[371,289]),
    [iquote('para_into,371.1.1.2.1,288.1.1')] ).

cnf(460,plain,
    f(f(A,f(A,A)),f(B,B)) = B,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[407,287]),407,407]),
    [iquote('para_from,406.1.1,286.1.1.2.2,demod,407,407')] ).

cnf(480,plain,
    f(f(A,f(A,A)),B) = f(B,B),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[460,289]),
    [iquote('para_into,460.1.1.2,288.1.1')] ).

cnf(602,plain,
    f(f(A,A),A) = f(B,f(B,B)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[385,480]),365]),
    [iquote('para_into,385.1.1.1,480.1.1,demod,365')] ).

cnf(606,plain,
    f(A,f(A,A)) = f(B,f(B,B)),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[602,480]),407]),
    [iquote('para_into,602.1.1.1,480.1.1,demod,407')] ).

cnf(607,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[606,2]),
    [iquote('binary,606.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : LAT394-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:26:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.91/2.12  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.91/2.12  The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.91/2.12  Wed Jul 27 08:26:05 2022
% 1.91/2.12  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 16346.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.91/2.12  set(auto).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.91/2.12  clear(print_given).
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  list(usable).
% 1.91/2.12  0 [] A=A.
% 1.91/2.12  0 [] f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),D),f(B,f(f(B,f(f(A,A),A)),C)))=B.
% 1.91/2.12  0 [] f(x0,f(x0,x0))!=f(x1,f(x1,x1)).
% 1.91/2.12  end_of_list.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.91/2.12  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.91/2.12     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ------------> process usable:
% 1.91/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] f(x1,f(x1,x1))!=f(x0,f(x0,x0)).
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ------------> process sos:
% 1.91/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] A=A.
% 1.91/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 4 [] f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),D),f(B,f(f(B,f(f(A,A),A)),C)))=B.
% 1.91/2.12  ---> New Demodulator: 5 [new_demod,4] f(f(f(f(A,B),f(B,C)),D),f(B,f(f(B,f(f(A,A),A)),C)))=B.
% 1.91/2.12    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.91/2.12  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 5.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Resetting weight limit to 29.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Resetting weight limit to 29.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  sos_size=66
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  sos_size=87
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.22 sec ----> 607 [binary,606.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Length of proof is 31.  Level of proof is 20.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.91/2.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.91/2.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.91/2.12  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ============ end of search ============
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.91/2.12  clauses given                 45
% 1.91/2.12  clauses generated           4573
% 1.91/2.12  clauses kept                 338
% 1.91/2.12  clauses forward subsumed    2553
% 1.91/2.12  clauses back subsumed          4
% 1.91/2.12  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.91/2.12  user CPU time          0.22          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.91/2.12  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.91/2.12  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.91/2.12  
% 1.91/2.12  Process 16346 finished Wed Jul 27 08:26:07 2022
% 1.91/2.12  Otter interrupted
% 1.91/2.12  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------