TSTP Solution File: LAT394-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : LAT394-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.92s 2.06s
% Output : Refutation 4.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 11 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 96 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 94 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(f_type,type,
f: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(x0_type,type,
x0: $i ).
thf(x1_type,type,
x1: $i ).
thf(or_type,type,
or: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(and_type,type,
and: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(neg_type,type,
neg: $i > $i ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( f @ x0 @ ( f @ x0 @ x0 ) )
!= ( f @ x1 @ ( f @ x1 @ x1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ( f @ x0 @ ( f @ x0 @ x0 ) )
!= ( f @ x1 @ ( f @ x1 @ x1 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) @ D ) @ ( f @ B @ ( f @ ( f @ B @ ( f @ ( f @ A @ A ) @ A ) ) @ C ) ) )
= B ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos) ).
thf(9,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) @ D ) @ ( f @ B @ ( f @ ( f @ B @ ( f @ ( f @ A @ A ) @ A ) ) @ C ) ) )
= B ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( and @ A @ B )
= ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ ( f @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_002) ).
thf(13,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( and @ A @ B )
= ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ ( f @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( or @ A @ B )
= ( f @ ( f @ A @ A ) @ ( f @ B @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_001) ).
thf(11,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( or @ A @ B )
= ( f @ ( f @ A @ A ) @ ( f @ B @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( neg @ A )
= ( f @ A @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_003) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( neg @ A )
= ( f @ A @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(104,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,9,13,11,15]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LAT394-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:56:52 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.86/0.86 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.17/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing done (107ms).
% 1.17/0.97 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.49/1.18 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.49/1.18 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.70/1.18 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.75/1.23 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.84/1.25 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.84/1.26 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.84/1.26 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.84/1.26 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.45/2.06 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.45/2.06 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.45/2.06 % Time passed: 1536ms (effective reasoning time: 1082ms)
% 4.45/2.06 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.92/2.06 % Axioms used in derivation (4): sos, sos_002, sos_001, sos_003
% 4.92/2.06 % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 4.92/2.06 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1536 ms resp. 1082 ms w/o parsing
% 4.92/2.08 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.92/2.08 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------