TSTP Solution File: LAT381+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LAT381+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:51:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07  % Problem  : LAT381+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 19:55:33 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.27  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.27  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.10/0.27  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.10/0.27  #
% 0.10/0.27  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.27  # Number of axioms: 33 Number of unprocessed: 33
% 0.10/0.27  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.10/0.27  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.10/0.27  # Hello from C++
% 0.10/0.27  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.10/0.27  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.10/0.27  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.10/0.27  # 33 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.10/0.27  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.10/0.27  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.10/0.27  # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.10/0.27  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.10/0.27  # 28 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.10/0.27  # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.10/0.27  
% 0.10/0.27  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.10/0.27  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.28  # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.28  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.28  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.28  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.28  
% 0.10/0.28  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.28  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (aSet0(xT))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_33, hypothesis, (aSubsetOf0(xS,xT))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_35, hypothesis, (aSupremumOfIn0(xu,xS,xT))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_34, hypothesis, (aSupremumOfIn0(xv,xS,xT))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (xv!=xu)).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X1)|~aElement0(X1))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (aSet0(X1)|~aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (~isEmpty0(X1)|~aElementOf0(X2,X1)|~aSet0(X1))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (aElement0(X1)|~aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X3,X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X3,X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (isEmpty0(X1)|aElementOf0(esk1_1(X1),X1)|~aSet0(X1))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aInfimumOfIn0(X1,X3,X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aSupremumOfIn0(X1,X3,X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)|~aElementOf0(esk2_2(X2,X1),X2)|~aSet0(X1)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aInfimumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=X2|~sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)|~sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~aElement0(X2)|~aElement0(X1))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)|aElementOf0(esk2_2(X2,X1),X1)|~aSet0(X1)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aSupremumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (aElementOf0(X1,X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X2))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X3,X4)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X4)|~aElementOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X4))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~aUpperBoundOfIn0(X2,X3,X4)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X4)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X4))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|aElementOf0(esk3_3(X3,X2,X1),X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~sdtlseqdt0(X1,esk3_3(X3,X2,X1))|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~sdtlseqdt0(esk4_3(X3,X2,X1),X1)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~aSupremumOfIn0(X1,X3,X4)|~aUpperBoundOfIn0(X2,X3,X4)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X4)|~aSet0(X4))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~aInfimumOfIn0(X2,X3,X4)|~aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X3,X4)|~aSubsetOf0(X3,X4)|~aSet0(X4))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)|~sdtlseqdt0(X3,X2)|~sdtlseqdt0(X1,X3)|~aElement0(X2)|~aElement0(X3)|~aElement0(X1))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|aElementOf0(esk4_3(X3,X2,X1),X2)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aElementOf0(X1,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (aSupremumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~sdtlseqdt0(X1,esk6_3(X3,X2,X1))|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (aInfimumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~sdtlseqdt0(esk5_3(X3,X2,X1),X1)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (aInfimumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|aLowerBoundOfIn0(esk5_3(X3,X2,X1),X2,X3)|~aLowerBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (aSupremumOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|aUpperBoundOfIn0(esk6_3(X3,X2,X1),X2,X3)|~aUpperBoundOfIn0(X1,X2,X3)|~aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)|~aSet0(X3))).
% 0.10/0.28  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.28  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.28  # Found 10 steps
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (xv!=xu), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (xv!=xu), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~sdtlseqdt0(xu,xv)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_216, plain, (~aSubsetOf0(xS,xT)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_218, plain, (~aSet0(xT)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (~sdtlseqdt0(xv,xu)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_78, ...])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (~aElement0(xu)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~aElement0(xv)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_80, ...])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_215, plain, (~aLowerBoundOfIn0(xu,xS,xT)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_215, ...])).
% 0.10/0.28  cnf(i_0_217, plain, (~aElementOf0(xv,xS)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_217, ...])).
% 0.10/0.28  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.28  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.28  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.28  # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.10/0.28  # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on
% 0.10/0.28  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.10/0.28  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.28  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------