TSTP Solution File: LAT379+4 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : LAT379+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:29:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 165.38s 162.31s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LAT379+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:12:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.91/11.69  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.91/11.69  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.91/11.69  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 23.42/22.84  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 23.42/22.84  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 23.42/22.84  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 35.28/34.53  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 35.28/34.53  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 35.28/34.53  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.07/45.92  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.07/45.92  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.07/45.92  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 53.71/52.42  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 53.71/52.42  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 53.71/52.42  Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 65.00/64.14  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 65.00/64.14  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 65.00/64.14  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 78.95/78.16  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 78.95/78.16  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 78.95/78.16  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 93.25/91.87  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 93.25/91.87  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 93.25/91.87  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 111.31/110.20  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 111.31/110.20  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 111.31/110.20  Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 165.34/162.26  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 165.34/162.26  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 165.34/162.26  Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 165.38/162.31  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------