TSTP Solution File: LAT378+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT378+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:29:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 168.07s 168.09s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT378+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:51:04 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 13.88/13.59 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 13.88/13.59 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 13.88/13.59 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 28.02/27.35 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 28.02/27.35 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 28.02/27.35 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 44.20/43.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 44.20/43.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 44.20/43.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 55.79/56.05 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 55.79/56.05 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 55.79/56.05 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 62.23/62.44 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 62.23/62.44 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 62.23/62.44 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 73.33/73.17 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 73.33/73.17 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 73.33/73.17 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 84.48/84.58 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 84.48/84.58 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 84.48/84.58 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 95.60/96.05 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 95.60/96.05 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 95.60/96.05 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 111.82/112.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 111.82/112.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 111.82/112.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 168.05/167.33 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 168.05/167.33 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 168.05/167.33 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 168.07/168.09 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------