TSTP Solution File: LAT368+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT368+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:29:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 179.15s 170.61s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT368+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:18:45 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.78/12.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.78/12.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.78/12.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 25.76/25.29 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 25.76/25.29 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 25.76/25.29 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 37.17/37.26 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 37.17/37.26 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 37.17/37.26 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 61.44/61.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 61.44/61.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 61.44/61.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 76.67/76.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.67/76.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.67/76.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 90.36/90.27 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 90.36/90.27 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 90.36/90.27 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 102.90/102.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 102.90/102.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 102.90/102.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 119.08/118.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 119.08/118.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 119.08/118.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 179.13/170.31 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 179.13/170.31 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 179.13/170.31 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 179.15/170.61 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------