TSTP Solution File: LAT364+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT364+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 169.61s 168.35s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LAT364+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:36:45 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.45/11.27 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.45/11.27 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.45/11.27 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.80/22.63 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.80/22.63 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.80/22.63 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.06/33.97 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.06/33.97 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.06/33.97 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.55/48.58 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.55/48.58 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.55/48.58 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 56.37/56.45 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 56.37/56.45 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 56.37/56.45 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.47/69.89 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.47/69.89 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.47/69.89 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 82.93/83.71 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 82.93/83.71 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 82.93/83.71 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 95.44/96.35 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 95.44/96.35 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 95.44/96.35 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 112.53/113.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 112.53/113.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 112.53/113.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 169.54/168.29 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 169.54/168.29 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 169.54/168.29 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 169.61/168.35 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------