TSTP Solution File: LAT359+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT359+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 165.36s 159.45s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : LAT359+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:04:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 13.12/12.80 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 13.12/12.80 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 13.12/12.80 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 24.90/24.18 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 24.90/24.18 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 24.90/24.18 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 36.63/35.53 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 36.63/35.53 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 36.63/35.53 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.46/47.06 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.46/47.06 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.46/47.06 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 55.36/53.68 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 55.36/53.68 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 55.36/53.68 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 67.06/65.63 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 67.06/65.63 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 67.06/65.63 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 78.90/77.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 78.90/77.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 78.90/77.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 91.14/88.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 91.14/88.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 91.14/88.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 107.65/105.57 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 107.65/105.57 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 107.65/105.57 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 165.33/158.71 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 165.33/158.71 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 165.33/158.71 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 165.36/159.45 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------