TSTP Solution File: LAT357+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT357+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.24s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LAT357+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 04:08:44 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 75.34/75.53 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 75.34/75.53 The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 75.34/75.53 Thu Jun 30 04:08:44 2022
% 75.34/75.53 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8439.
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 75.34/75.53 set(auto).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(auto1).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(process_input).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 75.34/75.53 clear(print_given).
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 formula_list(usable).
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=30.
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 75.34/75.53 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 75.34/75.53 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 75.34/75.53 clauses in usable.
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(para_from).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(para_into).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 75.34/75.53 dependent: set(factor).
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 ------------> process usable:
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v2_yellow_0(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v25_waybel_0(A)|v1_yellow_0(A).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v2_yellow_0(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v25_waybel_0(A)|v1_lattice3(A).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v2_yellow_0(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v25_waybel_0(A)|v2_lattice3(A).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_relat_1(A)| -v1_funct_1(A)| -v1_relat_1(B)| -v1_funct_1(B)|v1_relat_1(k5_relat_1(A,B)).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 83 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_lattice3(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(B)| -v3_orders_2(B)| -v4_orders_2(B)| -v1_lattice3(B)| -v2_lattice3(B)| -v3_lattice3(B)| -l1_orders_2(B)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(B))| -v17_waybel_0(C,A,B)| -m1_relset_1(C,u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(B))|v1_funct_1(k1_waybel34(A,B,C)).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 84 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_lattice3(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(B)| -v3_orders_2(B)| -v4_orders_2(B)| -v1_lattice3(B)| -v2_lattice3(B)| -v3_lattice3(B)| -l1_orders_2(B)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(B))| -v17_waybel_0(C,A,B)| -m1_relset_1(C,u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(B))|v1_funct_2(k1_waybel34(A,B,C),u1_struct_0(B),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)|v1_xboole_0(B)| -v1_xboole_0(k2_tarski(A,B)).
% 75.34/75.53 80 back subsumes 14.
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 ------------> process sos:
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 326 during input processing: 0 [copy,326,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 374 during input processing: 0 [copy,374,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 75.34/75.53 374 back subsumes 292.
% 75.34/75.53 Following clause subsumed by 327 during input processing: 0 [copy,375,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 75.34/75.53
% 75.34/75.53 ======= end of input processing =======
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 75.41/75.60 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 75.41/75.60 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 75.41/75.60 number of clauses in intial UL: 294
% 75.41/75.60 number of clauses initially in problem: 374
% 75.41/75.60 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 75.41/75.60 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 75.41/75.60 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 75.41/75.60 absolute distinct symbol count: 86
% 75.41/75.60 distinct predicate count: 48
% 75.41/75.60 distinct function count: 22
% 75.41/75.60 distinct constant count: 16
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 75.41/75.60
% 75.41/75.60 =========== start of search ===========
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 6 [ 1 9 53596 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 9 [ 1 13 78529 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 11 [ 1 2 8558 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 12 [ 1 3 15730 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 13 [ 7 1 4347 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 14 [ 1 23 126981 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 15 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 16 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 17 [ 3 4 28024 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 18 [ 7 4 24298 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 19 [ 4 2 11116 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 20 [ 9 2 6660 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 21 [ 3 2 6256 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 22 [ 8 2 2914 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 23 [ 2 5 27980 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 24 [ 5 1 3469 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 25 [ 2 6 32919 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 26 [ 10 2 4817 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 27 [ 4 4 27865 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 28 [ 6 4 22764 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 29 [ 5 2 7339 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 30 [ 5 5 26650 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 31 [ 7 3 16913 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 32 [ 6 5 26833 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 33 [ 16 1 3471 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 34 [ 8 6 33469 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 35 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 36 [ 23 2 5650 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 37 [ 12 12 75111 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 38 [ 13 2 4791 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 39 [ 33 1 3218 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 40 [ 31 2 3140 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 41 [ 11 6 36473 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 42 [ 38 2 5289 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 43 [ 10 7 50790 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 44 [ 49 6 40020 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 45 [ 10 4 23878 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 83.74/83.94
% 83.74/83.94 Model 46 [ 42 2 8471 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 83.74/83.94
% 300.03/300.24 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------