TSTP Solution File: LAT356+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT356+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 160.19s 158.30s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT356+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:34:05 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 11.85/11.64 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.85/11.64 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.85/11.64 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 23.28/22.71 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 23.28/22.71 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 23.28/22.71 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.67/34.12 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.67/34.12 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.67/34.12 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 46.02/45.51 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 46.02/45.51 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 46.02/45.51 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.84/52.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.84/52.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.84/52.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 66.32/66.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 66.32/66.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 66.32/66.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 77.95/77.96 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 77.95/77.96 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 77.95/77.96 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 89.40/89.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 89.40/89.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 89.40/89.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 105.64/105.18 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 105.64/105.18 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 105.64/105.18 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 160.17/157.39 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 160.17/157.39 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 160.17/157.39 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 160.19/158.30 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------