TSTP Solution File: LAT352+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT352+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 157.78s 156.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT352+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 15:08:42 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.82/11.63 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.82/11.63 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.82/11.63 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 23.38/22.83 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 23.38/22.83 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 23.38/22.83 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.80/34.14 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.80/34.14 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.80/34.14 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 46.21/45.56 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 46.21/45.56 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 46.21/45.56 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.94/52.40 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.94/52.40 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.94/52.40 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 64.73/64.61 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 64.73/64.61 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 64.73/64.61 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 76.53/76.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.53/76.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.53/76.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 88.13/87.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 88.13/87.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 88.13/87.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 104.38/103.19 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 104.38/103.19 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 104.38/103.19 Peak sizes were: global stack 128536 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 157.75/155.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 157.75/155.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 157.75/155.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128408 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 157.78/156.05 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------