TSTP Solution File: LAT351+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT351+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : LAT351+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 15:18:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.40 The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.40 Thu Jun 30 15:18:19 2022
% 0.14/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29168.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=20.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v2_waybel_8(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v1_waybel_5(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_waybel_8(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v1_waybel_5(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_realset2(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 90 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_waybel_0(B,A)| -m1_subset_1(B,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A)))|v13_waybel_0(k5_waybel_0(A,B),A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_relset_1(A,k1_tarski(B),k1_tarski(B))|v1_orders_2(g1_orders_2(k1_tarski(B),A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 140 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v3_struct_0(g1_orders_2(u1_struct_0(A),u1_orders_2(A))).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 141 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_orders_2(g1_orders_2(u1_struct_0(A),u1_orders_2(A))).
% 0.14/0.40 66 back subsumes 10.
% 0.14/0.40 128 back subsumes 127.
% 0.14/0.40 129 back subsumes 111.
% 0.14/0.40 130 back subsumes 112.
% 0.14/0.40 131 back subsumes 113.
% 0.14/0.40 132 back subsumes 114.
% 0.14/0.40 133 back subsumes 115.
% 0.14/0.40 134 back subsumes 122.
% 0.14/0.40 135 back subsumes 123.
% 0.14/0.40 136 back subsumes 116.
% 0.14/0.40 137 back subsumes 119.
% 0.14/0.40 138 back subsumes 120.
% 0.14/0.40 140 back subsumes 83.
% 0.14/0.40 140 back subsumes 79.
% 0.14/0.40 141 back subsumes 84.
% 0.14/0.40 141 back subsumes 80.
% 0.14/0.40 142 back subsumes 85.
% 0.14/0.40 142 back subsumes 81.
% 0.14/0.40 143 back subsumes 92.
% 0.14/0.40 144 back subsumes 94.
% 0.14/0.40 146 back subsumes 95.
% 0.14/0.40 146 back subsumes 86.
% 0.14/0.40 148 back subsumes 91.
% 0.14/0.40 150 back subsumes 97.
% 0.14/0.40 153 back subsumes 96.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 227 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_orders_2(k3_yellow_1(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 225 back subsumes 130.
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 352 during input processing: 0 [copy,352,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.40 352 back subsumes 207.
% 0.14/0.40 352 back subsumes 206.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.48 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.48 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.48 number of clauses in intial UL: 174
% 0.20/0.48 number of clauses initially in problem: 315
% 0.20/0.48 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 55
% 0.20/0.48 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.20/0.48 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.48 absolute distinct symbol count: 91
% 0.20/0.48 distinct predicate count: 43
% 0.20/0.48 distinct function count: 27
% 0.20/0.48 distinct constant count: 21
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------