TSTP Solution File: LAT349+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT349+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 140.43s 140.19s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LAT349+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:42:03 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 9.08/8.99 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 9.08/8.99 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 9.08/8.99 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 18.50/18.70 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 18.50/18.70 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 18.50/18.70 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 27.55/27.66 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 27.55/27.66 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 27.55/27.66 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 37.53/37.94 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 37.53/37.94 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 37.53/37.94 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.40/44.32 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.40/44.32 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.40/44.32 Peak sizes were: global stack 127896 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.90/54.02 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.90/54.02 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.90/54.02 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 62.15/63.14 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 62.15/63.14 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 62.15/63.14 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 73.42/74.39 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 73.42/74.39 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 73.42/74.39 Peak sizes were: global stack 127768 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 89.89/90.78 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 89.89/90.78 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 89.89/90.78 Peak sizes were: global stack 127896 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 140.38/140.05 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 140.38/140.05 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 140.38/140.05 Peak sizes were: global stack 127896 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 140.43/140.19 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------