TSTP Solution File: LAT344+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT344+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 145.30s 145.59s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LAT344+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:13:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.02/11.83 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.02/11.83 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.02/11.83 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 23.19/23.48 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 23.19/23.48 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 23.19/23.48 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 32.31/32.97 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.31/32.97 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.31/32.97 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 41.68/42.49 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 41.68/42.49 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 41.68/42.49 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 47.43/48.29 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.43/48.29 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.43/48.29 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 57.40/58.67 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 57.40/58.67 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 57.40/58.67 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 66.60/68.27 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 66.60/68.27 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 66.60/68.27 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 76.96/78.61 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.96/78.61 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.96/78.61 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 92.83/94.32 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 92.83/94.32 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 92.83/94.32 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 145.25/145.02 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 145.25/145.02 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 145.25/145.02 Peak sizes were: global stack 128032 kbytes, trail stack 4192 kbytes
% 145.30/145.59 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------