TSTP Solution File: LAT338+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT338+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 148.45s 147.68s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LAT338+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:49:27 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.26/11.03 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.26/11.03 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.26/11.03 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.31/21.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.31/21.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.31/21.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 31.22/31.69 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 31.22/31.69 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 31.22/31.69 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 41.62/42.46 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 41.62/42.46 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 41.62/42.46 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.76/48.74 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.76/48.74 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.76/48.74 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.76/59.69 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.76/59.69 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.76/59.69 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.22/70.53 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.22/70.53 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.22/70.53 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 79.91/81.16 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 79.91/81.16 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 79.91/81.16 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 96.02/96.75 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 96.02/96.75 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 96.02/96.75 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.43/147.07 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 148.43/147.07 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 148.43/147.07 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.45/147.68 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------