TSTP Solution File: LAT337+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT337+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14 % Problem : LAT337+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 02:03:52 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.40 The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.40 Wed Jun 29 02:03:52 2022
% 0.22/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11157.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v4_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v5_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v6_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v7_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v8_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v9_lattices(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 231 during input processing: 0 [copy,231,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.40 231 back subsumes 136.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.47 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.47 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.47 number of clauses in intial UL: 133
% 0.22/0.47 number of clauses initially in problem: 228
% 0.22/0.47 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.22/0.47 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.22/0.47 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.22/0.47 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.22/0.47 distinct predicate count: 38
% 0.22/0.47 distinct function count: 18
% 0.22/0.47 distinct constant count: 21
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47
% 0.22/0.47 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------