TSTP Solution File: LAT334+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT334+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.76s 0.96s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT334+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 20:29:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37 Tue Jun 28 20:29:19 2022
% 0.20/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2587.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 52 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 62 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 176 during input processing: 0 [copy,176,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 216 during input processing: 0 [copy,216,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37 216 back subsumes 170.
% 0.20/0.37 216 back subsumes 134.
% 0.20/0.37 216 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 177 during input processing: 0 [copy,217,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.95 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.95 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.95 number of clauses in intial UL: 163
% 0.76/0.95 number of clauses initially in problem: 209
% 0.76/0.95 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.76/0.95 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.76/0.95 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.76/0.95 absolute distinct symbol count: 82
% 0.76/0.95 distinct predicate count: 34
% 0.76/0.95 distinct function count: 30
% 0.76/0.95 distinct constant count: 18
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.95 k1_xboole_0=$c9.
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.76/0.95 30 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 958.0 K.
% 0.76/0.95 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.76/0.95 sym_ent ( 304) 198 0 198 0 58.8 K
% 0.76/0.95 term ( 32) 51656 47714 3942 68 125.3 K
% 0.76/0.95 rel ( 40) 40795 35977 4818 55 190.4 K
% 0.76/0.95 term_ptr ( 16) 13806 1239 12567 15 196.6 K
% 0.76/0.95 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 fpa_head ( 24) 1829 53 1776 20 42.1 K
% 0.76/0.95 fpa_tree ( 56) 2036 2036 0 28 1.5 K
% 0.76/0.95 context (1288) 6399 6399 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.76/0.95 trail ( 24) 20688 20688 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.76/0.95 imd_tree ( 32) 9 1 8 0 0.2 K
% 0.76/0.95 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 is_tree ( 24) 1882 151 1731 64 42.1 K
% 0.76/0.95 is_pos (2424) 23707 23707 0 10 23.7 K
% 0.76/0.95 fsub_pos ( 16) 4222 4222 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 literal ( 32) 8222 5964 2258 13 71.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 clause ( 88) 1441 854 587 2 50.6 K
% 0.76/0.95 list ( 272) 112 105 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.76/0.95 clash_nd ( 80) 1378 1378 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.76/0.95 clause_ptr ( 16) 493 52 441 2 6.9 K
% 0.76/0.95 int_ptr ( 16) 3612 1835 1777 8 27.9 K
% 0.76/0.95 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95 formula( 40) 1743 1743 0 850 33.2 K
% 0.76/0.95 formula_ptr( 16) 102 102 0 102 1.6 K
% 0.76/0.95 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.76/0.95 0.00
% 0.76/0.95 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.76/0.95 unindex time 0.00
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.76/0.95 1:0 2:2 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:1 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.76/0.95 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:1 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.76/0.95 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.76/0.95 31:0 32:1 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.76/0.95 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:2 50:2
% 0.76/0.95 51:0 52:2 53:2 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.76/0.95 61:0 62:1 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:3 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.76/0.95 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.76/0.95 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.76/0.95 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.76/0.95 All others: 225.
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------