TSTP Solution File: LAT324+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LAT324+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.10s 300.29s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : LAT324+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 09:46:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Wed Jun 29 09:46:18 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1501.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v4_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v5_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v6_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v7_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v8_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v9_lattices(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v3_lattices(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 57 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 57 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 58 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v17_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)| -v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v17_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v3_lattices(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 54 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)| -v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v3_lattices(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.12/0.37  97 back subsumes 76.
% 0.12/0.37  98 back subsumes 77.
% 0.12/0.37  99 back subsumes 78.
% 0.12/0.37  100 back subsumes 79.
% 0.12/0.37  101 back subsumes 80.
% 0.12/0.37  102 back subsumes 81.
% 0.12/0.37  103 back subsumes 82.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 249 during input processing: 0 [copy,249,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37  249 back subsumes 155.
% 0.12/0.37  249 back subsumes 154.
% 0.12/0.37  249 back subsumes 153.
% 0.12/0.37  249 back subsumes 152.
% 0.12/0.37  249 back subsumes 151.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.48  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.48  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.48  number of clauses in intial UL: 139
% 0.18/0.48  number of clauses initially in problem: 233
% 0.18/0.48  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 59
% 0.18/0.48  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 84
% 0.18/0.48  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.18/0.48  absolute distinct symbol count: 85
% 0.18/0.48     distinct predicate count: 40
% 0.18/0.48     distinct function count: 24
% 0.18/0.48     distinct constant count: 21
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.10/300.29  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------