TSTP Solution File: LAT322+4 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : LAT322+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:27:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 97.60s 24.39s
% Output   : Refutation 97.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  25 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  40 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  119 (  13   ~;   7   |;   2   &;  90   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0   ^;  48   !;   0   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(v1_xboole_0_type,type,
    v1_xboole_0: $i > $o ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_type,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(k2_xboole_0_type,type,
    k2_xboole_0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(k4_xboole_0_type,type,
    k4_xboole_0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk210_type,type,
    sk210: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk384_type,type,
    sk384: $i ).

thf(425,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
    <=> ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_xboole_0) ).

thf(3361,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
      & ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[425]) ).

thf(3362,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ A )
       => ( A = k1_xboole_0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3361]) ).

thf(3363,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3362]) ).

thf(3365,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3363]) ).

thf(3366,plain,
    v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[3365]) ).

thf(1312,axiom,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_gate_1) ).

thf(6937,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1312]) ).

thf(6938,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( v1_xboole_0 @ A ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[6937]) ).

thf(6939,plain,
    ~ ( v1_xboole_0 @ sk384 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6938]) ).

thf(7623,plain,
    ( ( v1_xboole_0 @ sk384 )
   != ( v1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[3366,6939]) ).

thf(7626,plain,
    sk384 != k1_xboole_0,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7623]) ).

thf(340,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).

thf(2983,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[340]) ).

thf(2984,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[2983]) ).

thf(2985,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[2984]) ).

thf(503,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ B ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t46_xboole_1) ).

thf(3655,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ B ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[503]) ).

thf(3656,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ B ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3655]) ).

thf(3657,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ B ) )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3656]) ).

thf(15279,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( ( k2_xboole_0 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
       != ( k2_xboole_0 @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[2985,3657]) ).

thf(15280,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ A )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[15279:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(678,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ B )
        = ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t32_xboole_1) ).

thf(4425,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ B )
        = ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[678]) ).

thf(4426,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ B )
       != ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4425]) ).

thf(4427,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ B )
       != ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4426]) ).

thf(4428,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( sk210 @ A @ ( k4_xboole_0 @ B @ A ) )
      = B ),
    introduced(tautology,[new_symbols(inverse(k4_xboole_0),[sk210])]) ).

thf(16661,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk210 @ B @ k1_xboole_0 )
        = C )
      | ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ A @ A )
       != ( k4_xboole_0 @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15280,4428]) ).

thf(16662,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk210 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16661:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(540,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 @ A )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_boole) ).

thf(3792,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 @ A )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[540]) ).

thf(3793,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 @ A )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3792]) ).

thf(3794,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 @ A )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[3793]) ).

thf(16643,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk210 @ B @ k1_xboole_0 )
        = C )
      | ( ( k4_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 @ A )
       != ( k4_xboole_0 @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[3794,4428]) ).

thf(16644,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk210 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[16643:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( k1_xboole_0 ))]]) ).

thf(16886,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : k1_xboole_0 = A,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[16662,16644]) ).

thf(16894,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[7626,16886]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT322+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:36:38 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.94/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 6.53/2.74  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (1839ms). 
% 6.53/2.75  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 7.06/2.94  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 7.06/2.95  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 7.06/2.95  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 10.36/4.16  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 34726 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 17.41/8.07  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1457 axioms (removed 33269 axioms). 
% 19.12/8.70  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 19.42/8.75  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 19.42/8.75  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 97.60/24.37  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 97.60/24.38  % Time passed: 23854ms (effective reasoning time: 21623ms)
% 97.60/24.38  % Axioms used in derivation (6): t1_boole, d5_xboole_0, t2_gate_1, t46_xboole_1, t4_boole, t32_xboole_1
% 97.60/24.38  % No. of inferences in proof: 37
% 97.60/24.39  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 23854 ms resp. 21623 ms w/o parsing
% 97.60/24.41  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 97.60/24.41  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------