TSTP Solution File: LAT311+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LAT311+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:43:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.01s 9.26s
% Output   : Refutation 9.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  30 unt;  13 nHn;  47 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  112 (  18 equ;  53 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(2,negated_conjecture,
    v10_lattices('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(3,negated_conjecture,
    l3_lattices('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(4,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1('SKOLEMAAAV2',u1_struct_0('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(6,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1('SKOLEMAAAV3',k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0('SKOLEMAAAV1'))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(7,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k18_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'),k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_filter_2) ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | k2_filter_0(X,Y) = a_2_0_filter_0(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_filter_0) ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | k5_filter_2(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_filter_2) ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X)))
    | k7_filter_2(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_filter_2) ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | k18_filter_2(X,Y) = a_2_0_filter_2(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_filter_2) ).

cnf(30,axiom,
    ( ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_lattice2) ).

cnf(35,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | m1_subset_1(k5_filter_2(X,Y),u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_filter_2) ).

cnf(36,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X)))
    | m1_subset_1(k7_filter_2(X,Y),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_filter_2) ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ l2_lattices(X)
    | l1_struct_0(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l2_lattices) ).

cnf(41,axiom,
    ( ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | l2_lattices(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l3_lattices) ).

cnf(68,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_lattice2) ).

cnf(69,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ l1_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_struct_0) ).

cnf(81,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc6_lattice2) ).

cnf(124,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | k2_filter_2(X,Y) = k2_filter_0(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k2_filter_2) ).

cnf(125,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | v1_xboole_0(Y)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X)))
    | k3_filter_2(X,Y) = k3_filter_0(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k3_filter_2) ).

cnf(132,axiom,
    r1_tarski(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

cnf(136,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | v1_xboole_0(Z)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Z,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X)))
    | ~ r2_hidden(Y,Z)
    | r1_tarski(k2_filter_0(X,Y),k3_filter_0(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t29_filter_0) ).

cnf(140,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,u1_struct_0(X))
    | k18_filter_2(X,Y) = k2_filter_2(k1_lattice2(X),k5_filter_2(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_filter_2) ).

cnf(142,axiom,
    ( v3_struct_0(X)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X)
    | v1_xboole_0(Y)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Y,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X)))
    | v1_xboole_0(Z)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(Z,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X))))
    | k3_filter_2(k1_lattice2(X),k7_filter_2(X,Y)) = k19_filter_2(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_filter_2) ).

cnf(147,axiom,
    ( m1_subset_1(X,k1_zfmisc_1(Y))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

cnf(183,plain,
    l3_lattices(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[30,3]) ).

cnf(200,plain,
    m1_subset_1(X,k1_zfmisc_1(X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[147,132]) ).

cnf(203,plain,
    ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[68,1,3]) ).

cnf(247,plain,
    v10_lattices(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[81,1,2,3]) ).

cnf(292,plain,
    k5_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[21,1,2,3,4]) ).

cnf(311,plain,
    k7_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3') = 'SKOLEMAAAV3',
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,1,2,3,6]) ).

cnf(317,plain,
    k18_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = a_2_0_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[24,1,2,3,4]) ).

cnf(318,plain,
    ~ r1_tarski(a_2_0_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'),k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,317,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(331,plain,
    m1_subset_1('SKOLEMAAAV2',u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[35,1,2,3,4]),292,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(356,plain,
    a_2_0_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = k2_filter_2(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[140,1,2,3,4]),292,317,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(362,plain,
    m1_subset_1('SKOLEMAAAV3',k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[36,1,2,3,6]),311,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(533,plain,
    l2_lattices(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[41,183]) ).

cnf(864,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')))
    | k3_filter_2(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[142,200,2,3,6]),311,5,1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1093,plain,
    l1_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[39,533]) ).

cnf(1710,plain,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[69,1093,203]) ).

cnf(1734,plain,
    k3_filter_2(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[864,1710]) ).

cnf(2212,plain,
    a_2_0_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = k2_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[124,331,203,247,183]),356,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2215,plain,
    a_2_0_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = a_2_0_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,331,203,247,183]),2212,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2217,plain,
    ~ r1_tarski(a_2_0_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[318,2215,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2299,plain,
    a_2_0_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = k2_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2212,2215,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8851,plain,
    k19_filter_2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3') = k3_filter_0(k1_lattice2('SKOLEMAAAV1'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[125,362,203,247,183,5]),1734,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8853,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[136,362,203,247,183,331,5,7]),2217,8851,2299,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LAT311+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 23:27:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T23:27:08
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-06-29T23:27:08
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |v2_funct_1| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |v1_binop_1| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |v1_partfun1| is a 3-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |v2_binop_1| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |v1_relat_1| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 9.01/9.26  
% 9.01/9.26  
% 9.01/9.26  #||
% 9.01/9.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.01/9.26  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 9.01/9.28  ||#
% 9.01/9.28  
% 9.01/9.28  ; Summary of computation:
% 9.01/9.28  ;     10455 formulas have been input or derived (from 481 formulas).
% 9.01/9.28  ;      8853 (85%) were retained.  Of these,
% 9.01/9.28  ;          395 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 9.01/9.28  ;         8458 (96%) are still being kept.
% 9.01/9.28  ; 
% 9.01/9.28  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.028   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.006   0%   Assert                       (101 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.457   5%   Process new row              (10,211 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     7.982  91%   Resolution                   (960 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.005   0%   Paramodulation               (480 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (5 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.003   0%   Condensing                   (773 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.068   1%   Forward subsumption          (773 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.025   0%   Backward subsumption         (673 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.004   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,583 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.087   1%   Forward simplification       (10,188 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.061   1%   Backward simplification      (8,852 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.004   0%   Ordering                     (1,776 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     0.061   1%   Other
% 9.01/9.28  ;     8.793        Total
% 9.01/9.28  ;     8.817        Real time
% 9.01/9.28  ; 
% 9.01/9.28  ; Term-hash-array has 16,549 terms in all.
% 9.01/9.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 482 entries (482 at peak, 673 added, 191 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,047 nodes (3,047 at peak, 4,314 added, 1,267 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ;  Retrieved 1,324 possibly forward subsuming rows in 773 calls.
% 9.01/9.28  ;  Retrieved 690 possibly backward subsumed rows in 673 calls.
% 9.01/9.28  ; Path-index has 16,212 entries (16,212 at peak, 16,733 added, 521 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ; Path-index has 6,453 nodes (6,456 at peak, 6,963 added, 510 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ; Trie-index has 16,212 entries (16,212 at peak, 16,733 added, 521 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ; Trie-index has 36,102 nodes (36,102 at peak, 38,578 added, 2,476 deleted).
% 9.01/9.28  ; Retrieved 3,660 generalization terms in 15,291 calls.
% 9.01/9.28  ; Retrieved 8,202 instance terms in 8,178 calls.
% 9.01/9.28  ; Retrieved 29,219,621 unifiable terms in 681,884 calls.
% 9.01/9.28  ; 
% 9.01/9.28  ; The agenda of rows to process has 54 entries:
% 9.01/9.28  ;     5 with value 15              2 with value 23               4 with value 39
% 9.01/9.28  ;     1 with value 16              4 with value 24               2 with value 40
% 9.01/9.28  ;     1 with value 17              2 with value 26               2 with value 44
% 9.01/9.28  ;     2 with value 18              2 with value 29               2 with value 47
% 9.01/9.28  ;     3 with value 20              6 with value 30               2 with value 54
% 9.01/9.28  ;     5 with value 21              2 with value 33               2 with value 58
% 9.01/9.28  ;     3 with value 22              2 with value 36
% 9.01/9.28  ; The agenda of rows to give has 7989 entries:
% 9.01/9.28  ;     1 with value (4 9)          16 with value (4 30)          20 with value (4 50)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     3 with value (4 10)          8 with value (4 31)           4 with value (4 51)
% 9.01/9.28  ;   185 with value (4 11)          8 with value (4 32)          12 with value (4 52)
% 9.01/9.28  ;   350 with value (4 12)         10 with value (4 33)           8 with value (4 53)
% 9.01/9.28  ;   487 with value (4 13)         12 with value (4 34)           4 with value (4 54)
% 9.01/9.28  ;   642 with value (4 14)          2 with value (4 35)           8 with value (4 55)
% 9.01/9.28  ;  1685 with value (4 15)         18 with value (4 36)           8 with value (4 56)
% 9.01/9.28  ;  1892 with value (4 16)         10 with value (4 37)           4 with value (4 57)
% 9.01/9.28  ;  2036 with value (4 17)          6 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 58)
% 9.01/9.28  ;   209 with value (4 18)          6 with value (4 39)           4 with value (4 59)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    27 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 40)          12 with value (4 60)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    16 with value (4 20)          8 with value (4 41)          12 with value (4 63)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    25 with value (4 21)         18 with value (4 42)           4 with value (4 65)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    19 with value (4 22)          6 with value (4 43)           8 with value (4 66)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    12 with value (4 23)          6 with value (4 44)           4 with value (4 69)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     4 with value (4 24)          6 with value (4 45)           4 with value (4 70)
% 9.01/9.28  ;     7 with value (4 25)         16 with value (4 46)           8 with value (4 73)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    15 with value (4 26)          4 with value (4 47)           4 with value (4 74)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    24 with value (4 27)          2 with value (4 48)           8 with value (4 77)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    14 with value (4 28)          8 with value (4 49)           8 with value (4 80)
% 9.01/9.28  ;    16 with value (4 29)
% 9.01/9.28  Evaluation took:
% 9.01/9.28    8.818 seconds of real time
% 9.01/9.28    8.627453 seconds of user run time
% 9.01/9.28    0.183275 seconds of system run time
% 9.01/9.28    [Run times include 0.659 seconds GC run time.]
% 9.01/9.28    0 calls to %EVAL
% 9.01/9.28    0 page faults and
% 9.01/9.28    732,817,312 bytes consed.
% 9.01/9.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 9.01/9.28  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T23:27:17
% 9.01/9.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 9.01/9.28  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------