TSTP Solution File: LAT305+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT305+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LAT305+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 16:30:33 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/0.34 Wed Jun 29 16:30:33 2022
% 0.17/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6133.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.17/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.17/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.17/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.17/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 102 during input processing: 0 [copy,102,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [copy,130,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/0.34 130 back subsumes 97.
% 0.17/0.34 130 back subsumes 96.
% 0.17/0.34 130 back subsumes 83.
% 0.17/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [copy,131,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.17/0.34
% 0.17/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.06/1.29 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.06/1.29 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.06/1.29 number of clauses in intial UL: 91
% 1.06/1.29 number of clauses initially in problem: 125
% 1.06/1.29 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 1.06/1.29 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 1.06/1.29 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.06/1.29 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 1.06/1.29 distinct predicate count: 32
% 1.06/1.29 distinct function count: 25
% 1.06/1.29 distinct constant count: 16
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.29
% 1.06/1.29 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.04/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------