TSTP Solution File: LAT304+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT304+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.00s 5.88s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 12 unt; 14 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 3 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1514,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_1514) ).
cnf(i_0_3967,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk627_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3967) ).
cnf(i_0_3966,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk627_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3966) ).
cnf(i_0_3968,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk627_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3968) ).
cnf(i_0_3065,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3065) ).
cnf(i_0_2732,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_2732) ).
cnf(i_0_998,plain,
( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_998) ).
cnf(i_0_2078,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_2078) ).
cnf(i_0_3413,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3413) ).
cnf(i_0_3965,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),esk627_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_3965) ).
cnf(i_0_1268,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vftwqs2a/lgb.p',i_0_1268) ).
cnf(c_0_3980,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_1514 ).
cnf(c_0_3981,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk627_0),
i_0_3967 ).
cnf(c_0_3982,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk627_0),
i_0_3966 ).
cnf(c_0_3983,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk627_0),
i_0_3968 ).
cnf(c_0_3984,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_3065 ).
cnf(c_0_3985,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_2732 ).
cnf(c_0_3986,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3980,c_0_3981]),c_0_3982])]),c_0_3983]) ).
cnf(c_0_3987,negated_conjecture,
u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)) = u1_struct_0(esk627_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3984,c_0_3982]),c_0_3983]) ).
cnf(c_0_3988,negated_conjecture,
( m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| ~ l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3985,c_0_3986]),c_0_3987]) ).
cnf(c_0_3989,plain,
( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_998 ).
cnf(c_0_3990,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2078 ).
cnf(c_0_3991,plain,
( m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3988,c_0_3989]),c_0_3982])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3992,plain,
( m1_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| ~ l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3990,c_0_3991]),c_0_3986])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3993,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
i_0_3413 ).
cnf(c_0_3994,plain,
( m1_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),k1_lattice2(esk627_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3992,c_0_3989]),c_0_3982])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3995,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk627_0),esk627_0),
i_0_3965 ).
cnf(c_0_3996,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
i_0_1268 ).
cnf(c_0_3997,plain,
v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk627_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3993,c_0_3994]),c_0_3981]),c_0_3982])]),c_0_3983]),c_0_3995]) ).
cnf(c_0_3998,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3996,c_0_3997]),c_0_3982])]),c_0_3983]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : LAT304+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 06:59:31 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.36/1.56 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.36/1.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.36/1.56 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 12.00/5.88 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 12.00/5.88 # No SInE strategy applied
% 12.00/5.88 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 12.00/5.88 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 12.00/5.88 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 12.00/5.88 #
% 12.00/5.88 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 12.00/5.88 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 12.00/5.88
% 12.00/5.88 # Proof found!
% 12.00/5.88 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.00/5.88 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.00/5.88 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.00/5.88
% 12.00/5.88 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.00/5.88 # User time : 0.091 s
% 12.00/5.88 # System time : 0.012 s
% 12.00/5.88 # Total time : 0.102 s
% 12.00/5.88 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 12.00/5.88
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------