TSTP Solution File: LAT304+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT304+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.18s 5.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 12 unt; 14 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 3 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1734,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_1734) ).
cnf(i_0_3876,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk607_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3876) ).
cnf(i_0_3875,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk607_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3875) ).
cnf(i_0_3877,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk607_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3877) ).
cnf(i_0_3187,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3187) ).
cnf(i_0_2926,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_2926) ).
cnf(i_0_1200,plain,
( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_1200) ).
cnf(i_0_2312,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_2312) ).
cnf(i_0_3427,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3427) ).
cnf(i_0_3874,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),esk607_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_3874) ).
cnf(i_0_1540,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kxpaxg04/lgb.p',i_0_1540) ).
cnf(c_0_3889,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_1734 ).
cnf(c_0_3890,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk607_0),
i_0_3876 ).
cnf(c_0_3891,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk607_0),
i_0_3875 ).
cnf(c_0_3892,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk607_0),
i_0_3877 ).
cnf(c_0_3893,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_3187 ).
cnf(c_0_3894,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_2926 ).
cnf(c_0_3895,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3889,c_0_3890]),c_0_3891])]),c_0_3892]) ).
cnf(c_0_3896,negated_conjecture,
u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)) = u1_struct_0(esk607_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3893,c_0_3891]),c_0_3892]) ).
cnf(c_0_3897,negated_conjecture,
( m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| ~ l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3894,c_0_3895]),c_0_3896]) ).
cnf(c_0_3898,plain,
( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
i_0_1200 ).
cnf(c_0_3899,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2312 ).
cnf(c_0_3900,plain,
( m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3897,c_0_3898]),c_0_3891])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3901,plain,
( m1_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| ~ l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3899,c_0_3900]),c_0_3895])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3902,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
i_0_3427 ).
cnf(c_0_3903,plain,
( m1_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),k1_lattice2(esk607_0))
| v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3901,c_0_3898]),c_0_3891])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3904,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk607_0),esk607_0),
i_0_3874 ).
cnf(c_0_3905,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
i_0_1540 ).
cnf(c_0_3906,plain,
v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(esk607_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3902,c_0_3903]),c_0_3890]),c_0_3891])]),c_0_3892]),c_0_3904]) ).
cnf(c_0_3907,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3905,c_0_3906]),c_0_3891])]),c_0_3892]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT304+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 22:26:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.69/0.92 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/0.92 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.69/0.92 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.69/0.92 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.18/5.07 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.18/5.07 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.18/5.07 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 11.18/5.07 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 11.18/5.07 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.18/5.07 #
% 11.18/5.07 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 11.18/5.07 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.18/5.07
% 11.18/5.07 # Proof found!
% 11.18/5.07 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.18/5.07 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.18/5.07 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.18/5.07
% 11.18/5.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.18/5.07 # User time : 0.062 s
% 11.18/5.07 # System time : 0.006 s
% 11.18/5.07 # Total time : 0.068 s
% 11.18/5.07 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 11.18/5.07
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------