TSTP Solution File: LAT300+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT300+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.98s 4.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 16 unt; 7 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 5 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1005,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_1005) ).
cnf(i_0_2906,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk508_0,esk507_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2906) ).
cnf(i_0_2908,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk507_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2908) ).
cnf(i_0_2907,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk507_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2907) ).
cnf(i_0_2909,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk507_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2909) ).
cnf(i_0_1010,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_1010) ).
cnf(i_0_3746,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_3746) ).
cnf(i_0_589,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_589) ).
cnf(i_0_2708,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk476_1(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2708) ).
cnf(i_0_2905,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk508_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk507_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2905) ).
cnf(i_0_1006,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_1006) ).
cnf(i_0_2718,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_2718) ).
cnf(i_0_1276,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-agvum0u7/lgb.p',i_0_1276) ).
cnf(c_0_3760,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1005 ).
cnf(c_0_3761,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk508_0,esk507_0),
i_0_2906 ).
cnf(c_0_3762,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk507_0),
i_0_2908 ).
cnf(c_0_3763,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk507_0),
i_0_2907 ).
cnf(c_0_3764,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk507_0),
i_0_2909 ).
cnf(c_0_3765,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1010 ).
cnf(c_0_3766,negated_conjecture,
m2_lattice4(esk508_0,esk507_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3760,c_0_3761]),c_0_3762]),c_0_3763])]),c_0_3764]) ).
cnf(c_0_3767,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_3746 ).
cnf(c_0_3768,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk508_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk507_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3765,c_0_3766]),c_0_3762]),c_0_3763])]),c_0_3764]) ).
cnf(c_0_3769,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
i_0_589 ).
cnf(c_0_3770,plain,
r1_tarski(esk508_0,u1_struct_0(esk507_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3767,c_0_3768]) ).
cnf(c_0_3771,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk507_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk508_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3769,c_0_3770]) ).
cnf(c_0_3772,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk476_1(X1),X1) ),
i_0_2708 ).
cnf(c_0_3773,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk508_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk507_0)) ),
i_0_2905 ).
cnf(c_0_3774,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1006 ).
cnf(c_0_3775,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2718 ).
cnf(c_0_3776,plain,
( esk508_0 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk476_1(esk508_0),u1_struct_0(esk507_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3771,c_0_3772]) ).
cnf(c_0_3777,negated_conjecture,
( esk508_0 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(esk476_1(esk508_0),u1_struct_0(esk507_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3773,c_0_3772]) ).
cnf(c_0_3778,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk508_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3774,c_0_3761]),c_0_3762]),c_0_3763])]),c_0_3764]) ).
cnf(c_0_3779,plain,
esk508_0 = k1_xboole_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3775,c_0_3776]),c_0_3777]) ).
cnf(c_0_3780,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
i_0_1276 ).
cnf(c_0_3781,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3778,c_0_3779]),c_0_3780])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : LAT300+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 13:58:03 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.67/0.87 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.67/0.87 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.67/0.87 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.67/0.87 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.98/4.60 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.98/4.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.98/4.60 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 11.98/4.60 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 11.98/4.60 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 11.98/4.60 #
% 11.98/4.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.037 s
% 11.98/4.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.98/4.60
% 11.98/4.60 # Proof found!
% 11.98/4.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.98/4.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.98/4.60 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.98/4.60
% 11.98/4.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.98/4.60 # User time : 0.157 s
% 11.98/4.60 # System time : 0.017 s
% 11.98/4.60 # Total time : 0.174 s
% 11.98/4.60 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 11.98/4.60
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------