TSTP Solution File: LAT300+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LAT300+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:46:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.87s 2.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  40   ~;  36   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   1 sgn  25   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t24_filter_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
         => ? [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
              & r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t24_filter_2) ).

fof(dt_m2_filter_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
         => ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
            & m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_m2_filter_2) ).

fof(dt_m2_lattice4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v10_lattices(X1)
        & l3_lattices(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
         => m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+375.ax',dt_m2_lattice4) ).

fof(t4_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
     => m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t4_subset) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
     => ( v1_xboole_0(X2)
        | r2_hidden(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t2_subset) ).

fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] : m1_subset_1(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v10_lattices(X1)
          & l3_lattices(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
           => ? [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
                & r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t24_filter_2]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X4)
        | ~ m2_filter_2(X4,X3)
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v10_lattices(X3)
        | ~ l3_lattices(X3) )
      & ( m2_lattice4(X4,X3)
        | ~ m2_filter_2(X4,X3)
        | v3_struct_0(X3)
        | ~ v10_lattices(X3)
        | ~ l3_lattices(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_filter_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
      & v10_lattices(esk1_0)
      & l3_lattices(esk1_0)
      & m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      & ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
        | ~ r2_hidden(X6,esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X3)
      | ~ v10_lattices(X3)
      | ~ l3_lattices(X3)
      | ~ m2_lattice4(X4,X3)
      | m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_lattice4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    v10_lattices(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    l3_lattices(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ r2_hidden(X4,X5)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X6))
      | m1_subset_1(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
    | v3_struct_0(X2)
    | ~ m2_lattice4(X1,X2)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X2)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    m2_lattice4(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,X4)
      | v1_xboole_0(X4)
      | r2_hidden(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3] : m1_subset_1(esk8_1(X3),X3),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    m1_subset_1(esk8_1(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | r2_hidden(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LAT300+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 13:44:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.87/2.05  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.87/2.05  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.87/2.05  # Preprocessing time       : 0.480 s
% 0.87/2.05  
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof found!
% 0.87/2.05  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.87/2.05  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object total steps             : 30
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.87/2.05  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.87/2.05  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.87/2.05  # Parsed axioms                        : 13607
% 0.87/2.05  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 13506
% 0.87/2.05  # Initial clauses                      : 288
% 0.87/2.05  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.87/2.05  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 287
% 0.87/2.05  # Processed clauses                    : 446
% 0.87/2.05  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.87/2.05  # ...subsumed                          : 49
% 0.87/2.05  # ...remaining for further processing  : 389
% 0.87/2.05  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.87/2.05  # Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.87/2.05  # Generated clauses                    : 1533
% 0.87/2.05  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1396
% 0.87/2.05  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 40
% 0.87/2.05  # Paramodulations                      : 1526
% 0.87/2.05  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.87/2.05  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 0.87/2.05  # Current number of processed clauses  : 359
% 0.87/2.05  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 76
% 0.87/2.05  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.87/2.05  #    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 0.87/2.05  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 269
% 0.87/2.05  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1217
% 0.87/2.05  # ...number of literals in the above   : 7934
% 0.87/2.05  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # Current number of archived clauses   : 30
% 0.87/2.05  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34504
% 0.87/2.05  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6079
% 0.87/2.05  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 79
% 0.87/2.05  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2680
% 0.87/2.05  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
% 0.87/2.05  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.87/2.05  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.87/2.05  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 384028
% 0.87/2.05  
% 0.87/2.05  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.87/2.05  # User time                : 0.501 s
% 0.87/2.05  # System time              : 0.030 s
% 0.87/2.05  # Total time               : 0.531 s
% 0.87/2.05  # Maximum resident set size: 32424 pages
% 0.87/24.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.87/24.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------