TSTP Solution File: LAT300+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT300+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.08s 3.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 16 unt; 6 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 3 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_799,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_799) ).
cnf(i_0_1963,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk379_0,esk378_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1963) ).
cnf(i_0_1965,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk378_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1965) ).
cnf(i_0_1964,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk378_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1964) ).
cnf(i_0_1966,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk378_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1966) ).
cnf(i_0_801,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_801) ).
cnf(i_0_2622,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_2622) ).
cnf(i_0_1962,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk379_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk378_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1962) ).
cnf(i_0_800,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_800) ).
cnf(i_0_1854,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk359_1(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_1854) ).
cnf(i_0_937,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3blj4zrk/lgb.p',i_0_937) ).
cnf(c_0_2634,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_799 ).
cnf(c_0_2635,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk379_0,esk378_0),
i_0_1963 ).
cnf(c_0_2636,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk378_0),
i_0_1965 ).
cnf(c_0_2637,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk378_0),
i_0_1964 ).
cnf(c_0_2638,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk378_0),
i_0_1966 ).
cnf(c_0_2639,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
i_0_801 ).
cnf(c_0_2640,negated_conjecture,
m2_lattice4(esk379_0,esk378_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2634,c_0_2635]),c_0_2636]),c_0_2637])]),c_0_2638]) ).
cnf(c_0_2641,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_2622 ).
cnf(c_0_2642,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk379_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk378_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2639,c_0_2640]),c_0_2636]),c_0_2637])]),c_0_2638]) ).
cnf(c_0_2643,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk379_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk378_0)) ),
i_0_1962 ).
cnf(c_0_2644,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_800 ).
cnf(c_0_2645,plain,
~ r2_hidden(X1,esk379_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2641,c_0_2642]),c_0_2643]) ).
cnf(c_0_2646,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk359_1(X1),X1) ),
i_0_1854 ).
cnf(c_0_2647,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk379_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2644,c_0_2635]),c_0_2636]),c_0_2637])]),c_0_2638]) ).
cnf(c_0_2648,plain,
esk379_0 = k1_xboole_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2645,c_0_2646]) ).
cnf(c_0_2649,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
i_0_937 ).
cnf(c_0_2650,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2647,c_0_2648]),c_0_2649])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT300+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 23:58:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.57 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.57 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.57 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.57 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.08/3.64 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.08/3.64 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.08/3.64 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.08/3.64 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 10.08/3.64 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 10.08/3.64 #
% 10.08/3.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 10.08/3.64 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.08/3.64
% 10.08/3.64 # Proof found!
% 10.08/3.64 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.08/3.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.08/3.64 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.08/3.64
% 10.08/3.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.08/3.64 # User time : 0.080 s
% 10.08/3.64 # System time : 0.008 s
% 10.08/3.64 # Total time : 0.088 s
% 10.08/3.64 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 10.08/3.64
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------