TSTP Solution File: LAT300+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LAT300+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:46:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.40s 1.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 62 ( 21 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 163 ( 24 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 171 ( 70 ~; 59 |; 28 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 13 ( 11 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 84 ( 7 sgn 47 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t8_boole,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
& X1 != X2
& v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+3.ax',t8_boole) ).
fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
? [X1] : v1_xboole_0(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',rc1_xboole_0) ).
fof(d5_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
<=> X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d5_xboole_0) ).
fof(rc2_funct_1,axiom,
? [X1] :
( v1_relat_1(X1)
& v1_xboole_0(X1)
& v1_funct_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+11.ax',rc2_funct_1) ).
fof(t24_filter_2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ? [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
& r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t24_filter_2) ).
fof(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( r1_tarski(X1,k1_xboole_0)
=> X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t3_xboole_1) ).
fof(dt_m2_filter_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
& m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_m2_filter_2) ).
fof(t3_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
<=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t3_subset) ).
fof(dt_m2_lattice4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
=> m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+375.ax',dt_m2_lattice4) ).
fof(t5_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
~ ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3))
& v1_xboole_0(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t5_subset) ).
fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
? [X2] : m1_subset_1(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) )
=> m1_subset_1(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t4_subset) ).
fof(t2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( r2_hidden(X3,X1)
<=> r2_hidden(X3,X2) )
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+1.ax',t2_tarski) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X3)
| X3 = X4
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_boole])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk20_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| X2 = k1_xboole_0 )
& ( X2 != k1_xboole_0
| v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_xboole_0])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( v1_relat_1(esk24_0)
& v1_xboole_0(esk24_0)
& v1_funct_1(esk24_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc2_funct_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X2 = X1
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk20_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v10_lattices(X1)
& l3_lattices(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
=> ? [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
& r2_hidden(X3,X2) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t24_filter_2]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ r1_tarski(X2,k1_xboole_0)
| X2 = k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
v1_xboole_0(esk24_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = esk20_0
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X4)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X4,X3)
| v3_struct_0(X3)
| ~ v10_lattices(X3)
| ~ l3_lattices(X3) )
& ( m2_lattice4(X4,X3)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X4,X3)
| v3_struct_0(X3)
| ~ v10_lattices(X3)
| ~ l3_lattices(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_filter_2])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X6] :
( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
& v10_lattices(esk1_0)
& l3_lattices(esk1_0)
& m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(X6,esk2_0) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,k1_xboole_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
k1_xboole_0 = esk24_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
esk24_0 = esk20_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
| r1_tarski(X3,X4) )
& ( ~ r1_tarski(X3,X4)
| m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( v3_struct_0(X3)
| ~ v10_lattices(X3)
| ~ l3_lattices(X3)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X4,X3)
| m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_m2_lattice4])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X4,X5)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X6))
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_subset])]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
! [X3] : m1_subset_1(esk5_1(X3),X3),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( X1 = esk20_0
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,esk20_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ r2_hidden(X4,X5)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X6))
| m1_subset_1(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X1,X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
m2_lattice4(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
m1_subset_1(esk5_1(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( X1 = esk20_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(esk20_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_49,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ r2_hidden(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
| X4 = X5 )
& ( r2_hidden(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
| r2_hidden(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
| X4 = X5 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_tarski])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| X1 != k1_xboole_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,esk5_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
esk5_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk20_0)) = esk20_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(X1,esk2_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( X1 = X2
| r2_hidden(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
| r2_hidden(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| X1 != esk20_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
~ r2_hidden(X1,esk20_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk2_0
| r2_hidden(esk3_2(X1,esk2_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 != esk20_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT300+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 23:58:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/1.57 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.40/1.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.40/1.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.121 s
% 0.40/1.57
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof found!
% 0.40/1.57 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/1.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object total steps : 62
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object clause steps : 35
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object formula steps : 27
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object conjectures : 15
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object clause conjectures : 12
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.40/1.57 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 22
% 0.40/1.57 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.40/1.57 # Parsed axioms : 2948
% 0.40/1.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2847
% 0.40/1.57 # Initial clauses : 250
% 0.40/1.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 250
% 0.40/1.57 # Processed clauses : 330
% 0.40/1.57 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.40/1.57 # ...subsumed : 25
% 0.40/1.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 295
% 0.40/1.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.40/1.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Backward-rewritten : 26
% 0.40/1.57 # Generated clauses : 1191
% 0.40/1.57 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1108
% 0.40/1.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 29
% 0.40/1.57 # Paramodulations : 1183
% 0.40/1.57 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.40/1.57 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 0.40/1.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 264
% 0.40/1.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.40/1.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.40/1.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 226
% 0.40/1.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 935
% 0.40/1.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 6384
% 0.40/1.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.40/1.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25217
% 0.40/1.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3011
% 0.40/1.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 39
% 0.40/1.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1316
% 0.40/1.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.40/1.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.40/1.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/1.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 95064
% 0.40/1.57
% 0.40/1.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/1.57 # User time : 0.153 s
% 0.40/1.57 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.40/1.57 # Total time : 0.165 s
% 0.40/1.57 # Maximum resident set size: 10684 pages
% 0.40/23.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/23.62 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------