TSTP Solution File: LAT299+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT299+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.14s 1.34s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LAT299+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 03:52:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Thu Jun 30 03:52:23 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3235.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [copy,129,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36 169 back subsumes 121.
% 0.12/0.36 169 back subsumes 103.
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [copy,170,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.77/0.99 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.77/0.99 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.77/0.99 number of clauses in intial UL: 117
% 0.77/0.99 number of clauses initially in problem: 166
% 0.77/0.99 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.77/0.99 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.77/0.99 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.77/0.99 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.77/0.99 distinct predicate count: 31
% 0.77/0.99 distinct function count: 27
% 0.77/0.99 distinct constant count: 19
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99
% 0.77/0.99 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.14/1.34
% 1.14/1.34 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.14/1.34 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.14/1.34 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.14/1.34 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.14/1.34
% 1.14/1.34
% 1.14/1.34 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.14/1.34 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.14/1.34 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.14/1.34 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.14/1.34
% 1.14/1.34
% 1.14/1.34 The job finished Thu Jun 30 03:52:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------