TSTP Solution File: LAT295+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT295+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 14.22s 14.41s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : LAT295+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.10 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 22:42:13 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.31 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.10/0.31 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.10/0.31 Wed Jun 29 22:42:13 2022
% 0.10/0.31 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2471.
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.10/0.31 set(auto).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.10/0.31 clear(print_given).
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 formula_list(usable).
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.10/0.31 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.10/0.31 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.10/0.31 clauses in usable.
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.10/0.31 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 ------------> process usable:
% 0.10/0.31 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.10/0.31 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 ------------> process sos:
% 0.10/0.31 Following clause subsumed by 95 during input processing: 0 [copy,95,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.10/0.31 Following clause subsumed by 126 during input processing: 0 [copy,126,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.10/0.31 126 back subsumes 82.
% 0.10/0.31 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [copy,131,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.10/0.31
% 0.10/0.31 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.51/0.76 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.51/0.76 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.51/0.76 number of clauses in intial UL: 77
% 0.51/0.76 number of clauses initially in problem: 124
% 0.51/0.76 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.51/0.76 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 0.51/0.76 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.51/0.76 absolute distinct symbol count: 61
% 0.51/0.76 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.51/0.76 distinct function count: 20
% 0.51/0.76 distinct constant count: 21
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76
% 0.51/0.76 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.62/6.87
% 6.62/6.87
% 6.62/6.87 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 6.62/6.87
% 6.62/6.87 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 270 givens.
% 6.62/6.87
% 7.23/7.48
% 7.23/7.48
% 7.23/7.48 Changing weight limit from 58 to 56.
% 7.23/7.48
% 7.23/7.48 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 275 givens.
% 7.23/7.48
% 7.71/7.92
% 7.71/7.92
% 7.71/7.92 Changing weight limit from 56 to 54.
% 7.71/7.92
% 7.71/7.92 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 280 givens.
% 7.71/7.92
% 8.13/8.36
% 8.13/8.36
% 8.13/8.36 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 8.13/8.36
% 8.13/8.36 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 285 givens.
% 8.13/8.36
% 8.61/8.81
% 8.61/8.81
% 8.61/8.81 Changing weight limit from 52 to 50.
% 8.61/8.81
% 8.61/8.81 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 290 givens.
% 8.61/8.81
% 8.95/9.20
% 8.95/9.20
% 8.95/9.20 Changing weight limit from 50 to 48.
% 8.95/9.20
% 8.95/9.20 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 295 givens.
% 8.95/9.20
% 9.41/9.61
% 9.41/9.61
% 9.41/9.61 Changing weight limit from 48 to 46.
% 9.41/9.61
% 9.41/9.61 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 9.41/9.61
% 9.41/9.61
% 9.41/9.61 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 300 givens.
% 9.41/9.61
% 10.50/10.72
% 10.50/10.72
% 10.50/10.72 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 10.50/10.72
% 10.50/10.72 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 315 givens.
% 10.50/10.72
% 11.20/11.41
% 11.20/11.41
% 11.20/11.41 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 11.20/11.41
% 11.20/11.41 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 325 givens.
% 11.20/11.41
% 11.57/11.77
% 11.57/11.77
% 11.57/11.77 Changing weight limit from 44 to 43.
% 11.57/11.77
% 11.57/11.77 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 330 givens.
% 11.57/11.77
% 12.53/12.74
% 12.53/12.74
% 12.53/12.74 Changing weight limit from 43 to 41.
% 12.53/12.74
% 12.53/12.74 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 345 givens.
% 12.53/12.74
% 14.22/14.41 v1_xboole_0(A).
% 14.22/14.41
% 14.22/14.41 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 14.22/14.41 364 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 11623.8 K.
% 14.22/14.41 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 14.22/14.41 sym_ent ( 304) 177 0 177 0 52.5 K
% 14.22/14.41 term ( 32) 5236323 5206152 30171 9312 1233.8 K
% 14.22/14.41 rel ( 40) 4304871 4243089 61782 19536 3176.5 K
% 14.22/14.41 term_ptr ( 16) 560445 368736 191709 47426 3736.5 K
% 14.22/14.41 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 fpa_head ( 24) 6158 1158 5000 169 121.1 K
% 14.22/14.41 fpa_tree ( 56) 61164 61164 0 443 24.2 K
% 14.22/14.41 context (1288) 306882 306882 0 8 10.1 K
% 14.22/14.41 trail ( 24) 4251229 4251229 0 10 0.2 K
% 14.22/14.41 imd_tree ( 32) 818 0 818 0 25.6 K
% 14.22/14.41 imd_pos (4024) 266 266 0 2 7.9 K
% 14.22/14.41 is_tree ( 24) 19501 5928 13573 589 331.9 K
% 14.22/14.41 is_pos (2424) 3112934 3112934 0 9 21.3 K
% 14.22/14.41 fsub_pos ( 16) 228801 228801 0 1 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 literal ( 32) 915831 889442 26389 10608 1156.2 K
% 14.22/14.41 clause ( 88) 108006 101528 6478 398 590.9 K
% 14.22/14.41 list ( 272) 86 79 7 2 2.4 K
% 14.22/14.41 clash_nd ( 80) 5613 5613 0 7 0.5 K
% 14.22/14.41 clause_ptr ( 16) 10850 4472 6378 396 105.8 K
% 14.22/14.41 int_ptr ( 16) 235273 182952 52321 4067 881.1 K
% 14.22/14.41 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41 formula( 40) 779 779 0 493 19.3 K
% 14.22/14.41 formula_ptr( 16) 76 76 0 76 1.2 K
% 14.22/14.41 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 14.22/14.41
% 14.22/14.41 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 14.22/14.41 0.00
% 14.22/14.41 FINDER time 0.00
% 14.22/14.41 unindex time 0.00
% 14.22/14.41
% 14.22/14.41 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 14.22/14.41 1:1 2:1 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:30 9:5 10:0
% 14.22/14.41 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:1 19:0 20:0
% 14.22/14.41 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 14.22/14.41 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:2 35:84 36:16 37:0 38:4 39:5 40:0
% 14.22/14.41 41:0 42:0 43:21 44:3 45:22 46:0 47:21 48:1 49:0 50:2
% 14.22/14.41 51:1 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 14.22/14.41 61:1 62:0 63:5 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:2 70:2
% 14.22/14.41 71:0 72:0 73:1 74:0 75:2 76:15 77:2 78:2 79:7 80:0
% 14.22/14.41 81:1 82:0 83:3 84:3 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:19 90:17
% 14.22/14.41 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:1 96:2 97:3 98:3 99:3
% 14.22/14.41 All others: 13792.
% 14.22/14.41
% 14.22/14.41 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 14.22/14.41
% 14.22/14.41 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------