TSTP Solution File: LAT292+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LAT292+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s 300.23s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LAT292+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 18:05:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Wed Jun 29 18:05:15 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31757.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)|v1_xboole_0(B)| -m1_relset_1(C,A,B)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,A,B)|v1_partfun1(C,A,B).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v4_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v5_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v6_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v7_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v8_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l3_lattices(A)|v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v11_lattices(A)|v9_lattices(A).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v17_lattices(A)|v3_realset2(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v1_pre_topc(k11_lopclset(A)).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 83 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -v17_lattices(A)|v3_realset2(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v2_pre_topc(k11_lopclset(A)).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 302 during input processing: 0 [copy,302,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  302 back subsumes 175.
% 0.13/0.37  302 back subsumes 174.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.45/0.64  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.45/0.64  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.45/0.64  number of clauses in intial UL: 168
% 0.45/0.64  number of clauses initially in problem: 295
% 0.45/0.64  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 56
% 0.45/0.64  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.45/0.64  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.45/0.64  absolute distinct symbol count: 99
% 0.45/0.64     distinct predicate count: 52
% 0.45/0.64     distinct function count: 27
% 0.45/0.64     distinct constant count: 20
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.23  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------