TSTP Solution File: LAT290+2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : LAT290+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:27:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 103.40s 21.26s
% Output   : Refutation 103.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  19 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  48 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  273 (  34   ~;  15   |;  23   &; 188   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   0   ^;  72   !;   6   ?;  78   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(k3_tarski_type,type,
    k3_tarski: $i > $i ).

thf(k1_zfmisc_1_type,type,
    k1_zfmisc_1: $i > $i ).

thf(k2_zfmisc_1_type,type,
    k2_zfmisc_1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(r1_tarski_type,type,
    r1_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(r2_hidden_type,type,
    r2_hidden: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(k1_xboole_0_type,type,
    k1_xboole_0: $i ).

thf(r2_tarski_type,type,
    r2_tarski: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk6_type,type,
    sk6: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk307_type,type,
    sk307: $i > $i ).

thf(200,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
        = k1_xboole_0 )
    <=> ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
        | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t113_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(1970,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[200]) ).

thf(1971,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
          = k1_xboole_0 )
       => ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( A = k1_xboole_0 )
          | ( B = k1_xboole_0 ) )
       => ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
          = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[1970]) ).

thf(1973,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
        = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1971]) ).

thf(1977,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B != k1_xboole_0 )
      | ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ B )
        = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1973]) ).

thf(1978,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1977]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ A )
        = ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ B @ B ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(1333,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ A )
        = ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ B @ B ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(1334,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ A )
       != ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ B @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[1333]) ).

thf(1335,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ A )
       != ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ B @ B ) )
      | ( A = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1334]) ).

thf(1336,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( sk6 @ A @ ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ B @ A ) )
      = B ),
    introduced(tautology,[new_symbols(inverse(k2_zfmisc_1),[sk6])]) ).

thf(25078,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk6 @ B @ k1_xboole_0 )
        = C )
      | ( ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ A @ k1_xboole_0 )
       != ( k2_zfmisc_1 @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1978,1336]) ).

thf(25079,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk6 @ k1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[25078:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( k1_xboole_0 )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(910,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(4820,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[910]) ).

thf(4821,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4820]) ).

thf(4822,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4821]) ).

thf(988,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( r1_tarski @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t100_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(5221,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( r1_tarski @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[988]) ).

thf(5222,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( r1_tarski @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5221]) ).

thf(1076,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
            & ( r1_tarski @ D @ C ) )
         => ( r2_hidden @ D @ B ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
         => ( r2_hidden @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) @ B ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ( r1_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t136_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(5585,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
            & ( r1_tarski @ D @ C ) )
         => ( r2_hidden @ D @ B ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
         => ( r2_hidden @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) @ B ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ~ ( ( r1_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1076]) ).

thf(5586,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] :
      ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
      & ! [C: $i,D: $i] :
          ( ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
            & ( r1_tarski @ D @ C ) )
         => ( r2_hidden @ D @ B ) )
      & ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( r2_hidden @ C @ B )
         => ( r2_hidden @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C ) @ B ) )
      & ~ ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( r1_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_tarski @ C @ B )
            & ~ ( r2_hidden @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[5585]) ).

thf(5590,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( r2_hidden @ A @ ( sk307 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[5586]) ).

thf(864,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
        & ( r1_tarski @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_ordinal1) ).

thf(4615,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
        & ( r1_tarski @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[864]) ).

thf(4616,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
        & ( r1_tarski @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[4615]) ).

thf(4617,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( r2_hidden @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( r1_tarski @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4616]) ).

thf(8422,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( r1_tarski @ C @ B )
      | ( ( r2_hidden @ A @ ( sk307 @ A ) )
       != ( r2_hidden @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5590,4617]) ).

thf(8423,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r1_tarski @ ( sk307 @ A ) @ A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[8422:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D )),bind(C,$thf( sk307 @ D ))]]) ).

thf(8447,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r1_tarski @ ( sk307 @ A ) @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8423]) ).

thf(13070,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( r1_tarski @ A @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ A ) ) )
     != ( r1_tarski @ ( sk307 @ B ) @ B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5222,8447]) ).

thf(13084,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( sk307 @ B ) )
      | ( ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ A ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13070]) ).

thf(13091,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ A ) ) )
     != A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13084]) ).

thf(13711,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A )
       != B )
      | ( ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) )
       != ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[4822,13091]) ).

thf(13715,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) )
     != ( k3_tarski @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[13711]) ).

thf(24581,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ A ) ) )
     != A ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[13715,4822]) ).

thf(25246,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ ( sk6 @ k1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ) )
       != B )
      | ( A
       != ( k1_zfmisc_1 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[25079,24581]) ).

thf(25247,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( k3_tarski @ ( sk307 @ ( sk6 @ k1_xboole_0 @ k1_xboole_0 ) ) )
     != A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[25246:[bind(A,$thf( k1_zfmisc_1 @ C )),bind(B,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(26699,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25247]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : LAT290+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.16  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.17/0.38  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.38  % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:03:04 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.97/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 3.07/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (531ms). 
% 3.07/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.38/1.62  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.38/1.62  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 3.38/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 4.66/1.92  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 6453 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 6.41/2.65  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1217 axioms (removed 5236 axioms). 
% 8.21/3.16  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 8.40/3.20  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 8.40/3.20  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 103.40/21.25  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 103.40/21.26  % Time passed: 20709ms (effective reasoning time: 19831ms)
% 103.40/21.26  % Axioms used in derivation (6): t113_zfmisc_1, t99_zfmisc_1, t115_zfmisc_1, t7_ordinal1, t100_zfmisc_1, t136_zfmisc_1
% 103.40/21.26  % No. of inferences in proof: 40
% 103.40/21.26  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 20709 ms resp. 19831 ms w/o parsing
% 103.40/21.28  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 103.40/21.28  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------