TSTP Solution File: LAT288+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT288+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:28:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 16.33s 4.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 16.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 15 unt; 16 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 136 ( 5 equ; 76 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2485,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,k7_lopclset(X1))
| X3 != X2
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X3,X1)
| ~ v1_filter_0(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2485) ).
cnf(i_0_1270,plain,
( esk208_3(X1,X2,X3) = X1
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| v3_realset2(X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2)
| ~ v17_lattices(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,a_2_0_lopclset(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_1270) ).
cnf(i_0_538,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| r2_hidden(esk105_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_538) ).
cnf(i_0_537,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk105_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_537) ).
cnf(i_0_1269,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| v1_filter_0(esk208_3(X2,X1,X3),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_1269) ).
cnf(i_0_1271,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| m1_filter_0(esk208_3(X2,X1,X3),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_1271) ).
cnf(i_0_2560,negated_conjecture,
~ r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(esk395_0,esk396_0),k7_lopclset(esk395_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2560) ).
cnf(i_0_2564,negated_conjecture,
v17_lattices(esk395_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2564) ).
cnf(i_0_2565,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk395_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2565) ).
cnf(i_0_2562,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk395_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2562) ).
cnf(i_0_2561,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk396_0,u1_struct_0(esk395_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2561) ).
cnf(i_0_2563,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_realset2(esk395_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2563) ).
cnf(i_0_2566,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk395_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-290tkz8a/lgb.p',i_0_2566) ).
cnf(c_0_2580,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| r2_hidden(X2,k7_lopclset(X1))
| X3 != X2
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X3,X1)
| ~ v1_filter_0(X3,X1) ),
i_0_2485 ).
cnf(c_0_2581,plain,
( esk208_3(X1,X2,X3) = X1
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| v3_realset2(X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2)
| ~ v17_lattices(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,a_2_0_lopclset(X2,X3)) ),
i_0_1270 ).
cnf(c_0_2582,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| r2_hidden(esk105_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_538 ).
cnf(c_0_2583,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk105_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_537 ).
cnf(c_0_2584,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,k7_lopclset(X2))
| v3_realset2(X2)
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| ~ v1_filter_0(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_filter_0(X1,X2)
| ~ v17_lattices(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X2)
| ~ l3_lattices(X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2580]) ).
cnf(c_0_2585,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| v1_filter_0(esk208_3(X2,X1,X3),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X3)) ),
i_0_1269 ).
cnf(c_0_2586,plain,
( esk208_3(esk105_2(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3),X1,X2) = esk105_2(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2581,c_0_2582]) ).
cnf(c_0_2587,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| m1_filter_0(esk208_3(X2,X1,X3),X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X3)) ),
i_0_1271 ).
cnf(c_0_2588,plain,
( v3_realset2(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_tarski(X2,k7_lopclset(X1))
| ~ v1_filter_0(esk105_2(X2,k7_lopclset(X1)),X1)
| ~ m1_filter_0(esk105_2(X2,k7_lopclset(X1)),X1)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2583,c_0_2584]) ).
cnf(c_0_2589,plain,
( v1_filter_0(esk105_2(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3),X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2585,c_0_2586]),c_0_2582]) ).
cnf(c_0_2590,plain,
( m1_filter_0(esk105_2(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3),X1)
| v3_realset2(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2587,c_0_2586]),c_0_2582]) ).
cnf(c_0_2591,negated_conjecture,
~ r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(esk395_0,esk396_0),k7_lopclset(esk395_0)),
i_0_2560 ).
cnf(c_0_2592,plain,
( v3_realset2(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| r1_tarski(a_2_0_lopclset(X1,X2),k7_lopclset(X1))
| ~ v17_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2588,c_0_2589]),c_0_2590]) ).
cnf(c_0_2593,negated_conjecture,
v17_lattices(esk395_0),
i_0_2564 ).
cnf(c_0_2594,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk395_0),
i_0_2565 ).
cnf(c_0_2595,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk395_0),
i_0_2562 ).
cnf(c_0_2596,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk396_0,u1_struct_0(esk395_0)),
i_0_2561 ).
cnf(c_0_2597,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_realset2(esk395_0),
i_0_2563 ).
cnf(c_0_2598,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk395_0),
i_0_2566 ).
cnf(c_0_2599,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2591,c_0_2592]),c_0_2593]),c_0_2594]),c_0_2595]),c_0_2596])]),c_0_2597]),c_0_2598]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LAT288+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 04:39:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.59/0.85 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.85 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.59/0.85 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.59/0.85 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 16.33/4.85 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 16.33/4.85 # No SInE strategy applied
% 16.33/4.85 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 16.33/4.85 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 16.33/4.85 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 16.33/4.85 #
% 16.33/4.85 # Preprocessing time : 0.043 s
% 16.33/4.85
% 16.33/4.85 # Proof found!
% 16.33/4.85 # SZS status Theorem
% 16.33/4.85 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 16.33/4.85 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 16.33/4.85
% 16.33/4.85 # -------------------------------------------------
% 16.33/4.85 # User time : 0.754 s
% 16.33/4.85 # System time : 0.026 s
% 16.33/4.85 # Total time : 0.780 s
% 16.33/4.85 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 16.33/4.85
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------